Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Heating system that is 20 times cheaper than gas, oil or electricity.

Options

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,532 ✭✭✭A2LUE42


    Furez wrote: »
    http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/innovative-new-heating-system-may-yet-save-us-all-millions-29950123.html


    I'm no engineer but using electricity, to run a noisy compressor, to produce heat, seems to involve a lot of energy wasting steps. I'd go with too good to be true. Especially when I see "heat produced in the most energy efficient manner possible".

    Reminds me of that wetter water thing the indo published last year.

    €7000 to install and no actual running or maintenance costs referenced for a normal size house.(Whatever the scientific dimensions and u values of a normal house are)


  • Registered Users Posts: 905 ✭✭✭Ciaran


    Is it a heat pump? The article doesn't give much detail, mostly a press release I'd imagine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    I suppose there's a method to this,
    Heat pumps work best when there's a good temperature difference between the media - so if you're taking heat from the air to heat your house, it's best when the air temp is hotter than inside - but those days are like the middle of the summer and so, no need to heat house then.

    When it's cold you're trying to get heat from 5 degree heat into a 20 degree house.

    So I guess, using Charles Law, compressing the outside air, increases the temperature by Charles' Law, making the heat transfer more efficient.

    Compressing air doesn't take much energy so I guess if the energy to compress air is << than the extra energy then you're up


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    Whatever about the feasibility of the system (I'll read up on it when I have the time), the standard of scientific/technical reporting in modern media makes me want to cry:
    The revolutionary system works on the principal that the outside air – irrespective of how cold it is – contains some degree of heat in the form of solar energy from the sun which is trapped in the moisture.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter




  • Registered Users Posts: 128 ✭✭Furez


    That Norway report is interesting, in that it does seem to be more efficient, but people are more wasteful in proportion to negate the savings. Picturing half naked Nordic folk swanning around the house with open windows :).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter


    Furez wrote: »
    That Norway report is interesting, in that it does seem to be more efficient, but people are more wasteful in proportion to negate the savings. Picturing half naked Nordic folk swanning around the house with open windows :).

    You wish,lol


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,695 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    In 1865, English economist William Stanley Jevons observed that efficiency improvements in a resource’s use tend to increase rather decrease its use. The observation became known as the Jevons paradox.

    The Jevons paradox is sometimes used in modern economics to suggest that energy conservation is futile.
    Second point first. Go for insulation.

    First point is really interesting when you look at lighting

    http://www.sandia.gov/~jytsao/tsao_jy_2010_04_app_for_light_LEUKOS.pdf
    We have self-consistently analyzed data for per-capita consumption of artificial
    light, per-capita gross domestic product, and cost of light. The data span a wide
    range: 3 centuries (1700–2006), 6 continents (Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe,
    North America, South America), 5 types of fuel (tallow, whale oil, gas, petroleum,
    electricity), 5 overall families of lighting technologies (candles, oil lamps, gas
    lamps, electric incandescent bulbs, electric gas-discharge bulbs or tubes), 1.4
    orders of magnitude in per-capita gross domestic product,
    4.3 orders of magnitude in cost of light, and 5.4 orders of magnitude in per-capita consumption of light.

    We find that the data are consistent with a simple expression in which
    per-capita consumption of artificial light varies linearly with the ratio between
    per-capita gross domestic product and cost of light.

    Light is really cheap these days http://www.buyincoins.com/item/17637.html 10 Watt LED - €0.87 delivered :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18 AngusB


    djpbarry wrote: »
    Whatever about the feasibility of the system (I'll read up on it when I have the time), the standard of scientific/technical reporting in modern media makes me want to cry:

    These systems are all over the place already, and if you see a "cassett" in the ceiling of a store, for example, its usually connected to a compressor outdoors which either sends hot or cool air to the cassette.

    If you google "Air source heat pumps explained - Creating an energy ..." you'll find an interesting article from Which? which explains how they work and explains "The Energy Saving Trust (EST) estimates that the cost of installing a typical ASHP system ranges between £7,000 and £14,000. "

    "The EST says that an average performing air source heat pump in an average four-bedroom detached home could save:

    between £545 to £880 a year if replacing oil
    between £550 and £1,060 a year if replacing electric heating."

    An interesting type of heating found in many Japanese homes is a paraffin inverter heater - if you go to youtube and search for "Inverter Paraffin Heaters Ireland" you'll see a form of heater which is inexpensive compared to an air source heat system, and the running costs are competitive.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,427 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    Compressing air doesn't take much energy so I guess if the energy to compress air is << than the extra energy then you're up

    I fail to see how this would work in that energy cannot be created or destroyed just change form. Therefore the energy created would be equal what was used. Some of the energy may be converted to a form other than heat so you would in effect be down.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,993 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    It works because it extracts heat from some place outside, either the air or a coil buried in the ground. It is just a fridge in reverse.

    This is funny though;
    ...an engineering company in Castleblaney, Co Monaghan has designed a pioneering low-cost heating system ....
    Its origins are fairly everyday: while pumping up a bicycle tyre one day, Gerry Duffy observed that the pump got very hot when too much air was pumped in.
    Curious about the phenomenon, it led him to develop an amazing heating system using compressed air
    .... and luckily Gerry was able to import his new "invention" from Austria where they have been making them for donkeys years :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭dlouth15


    So why are they not more popular in Ireland? Do they involve a lot more work to install than central heating? Also how do they compare with ground loop systems in terms of efficiency?


Advertisement