Is gay marriage a threat to humanity?

vixen chaser wrote: »

Gay marraige is wrong, full stop. I don't consider myself conservative or a gay basher, but gay marraige is unnatural. It's not just the religious aspect of it, itvis also the social. If countries allow this to happen, and in some cases it has, society will simply become disturbed. Marraige is sacred between man and woman. Now in my opinion there are many straight people who only consider marraige simply a day out and before you know it divorce papers are on the table. Divorce in my opinion was the worst thing to happen to this country. Marraige should be for life between man and woman, who then may create a family of their own by reproducing. Gay's can't do that, simply because life wasn't created that way. full stop. I say that with obviously no disrespect to childless hetro couples.

I agree. I'm mean there should be basic rules to govern society according to natural law. Take interracial marriages. That's another abomination. It's just not right that people of different races get together and have half-cast children. Those children will have no identity, they're lost, they're nothing. Even interclass marriages are sickening. Blacks should go with blacks. Whites should go with whites. Working class should go with working class. Higher class should go with higher class. Men should only marry women. Wives shouldn't be allowed to work outside the home and they should be the possession of the husbands. And what's with this crazy talk of women's suffrage? Society was far better off when people just knew their place.

if you want to down the religious route, God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. I know some hetro couples aren't blessed with children, that's not what I meant. I meant that the institution of marriage was created for man and woman, and more often than not, children came after in a carraige? one question, I'd love to ask though. How come when male gays come out of the closet they become incredibly camp, or maybe it's spelled kamp, pardon my spelling:D and they wern't that way before they came out., just curious. In reply o one thread about marraige breakdown and been miserable for enternity and making the children miserable, then I would say to you, don't get married. Some people can' get on with their siblings, but they'll always be yur sibling. When a person gets married, regardless of whether there are kids in the picture, there is a family created.

vixen chaser wrote: »

if you want to down the religious route, God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. I know some hetro couples aren't blessed with children, that's not what I meant. I meant that the institution of marriage was created for man and woman, and more often than not, children came after in a carraige? one question, I'd love to ask though. How come when male gays come out of the closet they become incredibly camp, or maybe it's spelled kamp, pardon my spelling:D and they wern't that way before they came out., just curious. In reply o one thread about marraige breakdown and been miserable for enternity and making the children miserable, then I would say to you, don't get married. Some people can' get on with their siblings, but they'll always be yur sibling. When a person gets married, regardless of whether there are kids in the picture, there is a family created.

I can't say I speak for everyone on this thread but, I'd imagine most of us don't want to go down the religious route.

I can think of 5 guys I've known throughout my life that turned out to be gay. None of them transformed into some sort of Big Gay Al parody you're trying to describe.

Having said that I'd imagine some men after they came out became noticeably more "camp". Do you know why?

Because of fear of expressing their real nature around bigots like you.

Edit: I'm willing to read any future posts of yours and consider them genuine opinions but I think you're trolling here. Just my opinion

just not natural , and if gays are allowed to marry , then the whole idea of marraige should be abandoned for everyone. the issue of giving gays the right to marry is not on par with giving women suffrege or blacks the right to vote, that is totally different.

vixen chaser wrote: »

if you want to down the religious route, God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

You know the way God made Adam & Eve and they were the only two people on the planet when it all started. So wouldn't their children have had to go forth and multiply with each other and populate the world? So, is God in favour incestuous marriages but not gay marriages? If we're going down the religious route I think we should legalise incestuous marriages, also polygamous marriages - there's a heck of a lot of those in the Bible too.

vixen chaser wrote: »

I know some hetro couples aren't blessed with children, that's not what I meant. I meant that the institution of marriage was created for man and woman, and more often than not, children came after in a carraige?

So did God create the institution of marriage? I'm an fundamentalist Orthodox Cherokee, I believe that the institution of marriage was created by the Great Snorting Bullfrog God Blurbocheeko.

vixen chaser wrote: »

How come when male gays come out of the closet they become incredibly camp, or maybe it's spelled kamp, pardon my spelling:D and they wern't that way before they came out., just curious.

That's a ridiculous sterotype. I prefer cock, son, cock! Now go off and play with your titties you girly fag!

vixen chaser wrote: »

In reply o one thread about marraige breakdown and been miserable for enternity and making the children miserable, then I would say to you, don't get married. Some people can' get on with their siblings, but they'll always be yur sibling. When a person gets married, regardless of whether there are kids in the picture, there is a family created.

I can't understand what point you're trying to make here...

Pacifist Pigeon wrote: »

You know the way God made Adam & Eve and they were the only two people on the planet when it all started. So wouldn't their children have had to go forth and multiply with each other and populate the world? So, is God in favour incestuous marriages but not gay marriages?



So did God create the institution of marriage? I'm an fundamentalist Orthodox Cherokee, I believe that the institution of marriage was created by the Great Snorting Bullfrog God Blurbocheeko.



That's a ridiculous sterotype. I prefer cock, son, cock! Now go off and play with your titties you girly fag!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in9SiDtJLaU

I can't understand what point you're trying to make here...

You prefer cock, good for you. As for the point I am making, once a person gets married, then a family is created, your spouse becomes your family. That should remain a family for ever. If a person choses to get married, then that should be for life. I just think people should take marraige more seriously.

vixen chaser wrote: »

You prefer cock, good for you. As for the point I am making, once a person gets married, then a family is created, your spouse becomes your family. That should remain a family for ever. If a person choses to get married, then that should be for life. I just think people should take marraige more seriously.

So, let's say a husband beat the holy living tonsils out of his wife and kids and the wife doesn't want to be with him anymore - do you think that they should still be viewed as a happy loving functional family unit in the eyes of the law?

what question did you put to me. My last post means exactly what it states. I'm entitled to my opinion on marraige, as a citizen of this country.

vixen chaser wrote: »

I have no problem, with gay coming out etc, but I do with marriage

Ah come on now Vixen, just because we had a tumble around in the leaba doesn't mean we have to get married. It was just a once off Vixen, you don't have to be ashamed and go the whole way.

grindle wrote: »

Are you inviting Pacifist Pigeon somewhere?

?????????????/