Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

How realistic is The Wind That Shakes the Barley?

  • 04-04-2010 10:48pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 3,601 ✭✭✭Kotek Besar


    I know it's not a true story as such. The characters and plot are fictional, however based in a real situation.

    But how realistic is it?

    Does it portray the Irish as romantic, idealistic resistance fighters who take to violence only because there is no other self-respecting course, while portraying the British as blood-thirsty, sadistic, murdering psychopaths? How accurate is all this? Is the movie fair and balanced, or is it biased?


«1345

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,016 ✭✭✭CreepingDeath


    They tuk ur land !


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,219 ✭✭✭PK2008


    Its true, Cork people really do talk like that


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,595 ✭✭✭bonerm


    More realistic that Michael Collins (1995) anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,039 ✭✭✭bazmaiden


    At least julia roberts isn't in it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,944 ✭✭✭✭ Anastasia Nutty Beach


    PK2008 wrote: »
    Its true, Cork people really do talk like that

    I laughed through the whole film because of their stupid accents.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    bazmaiden wrote: »
    At least julia roberts isn't in it

    That's always a good thing


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's a film with goodies and baddies. As with most things in history when you look into it the truth usually falls in the middle.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,815 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    Accents in fairness were more realistic than Tom Cruise in Far and Away:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,973 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    I know it's not a true story as such. The characters and plot are fictional, however based in a real situation.

    But how realistic is it?

    Does it portray the Irish as romantic, idealistic resistance fighters who take to violence only because there is no other self-respecting course, while portraying the British as blood-thirsty, sadistic, murdering psychopaths? How accurate is all this? Is the movie fair and balanced, or is it biased?

    I was particularly fond of the little Leprechaun chappies, and the bint who chewed the poisonous apple.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,473 ✭✭✭R0ot


    It's true, Ireland is very green. :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,262 ✭✭✭✭Joey the lips


    Just watching it all always think the same.... No wonder it took us 800 years to get them out...

    We were gob****es.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,815 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    Just watching it all always think the same.... No wonder it took us 800 years to get them out...

    We were gob****es.

    Sadly we didn't end up much better with the way our own gob****es ****ed the country.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭RichTea


    100% inaccurate!

    It's in colour...everything was in black and white in those days.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,838 ✭✭✭✭ Ophelia Unimportant Leper


    I dunno, but it's a deadly film anyways.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 882 ✭✭✭fulhamfanincork


    I laughed through the whole film because of their stupid accents.

    If only there was a thumbs down option ,like.

    Our accent is unique and top class boi.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,057 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    The sentiment between characters in the movie is probably played up a lot, but the events that took place are very real.. it caused a lot of controversy because of how depictive it was.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    although it's biased, most of it is factually accurate. it also shows most of the pro treatyites as me feiners which has to be a good thing :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭Dionysus


    There was one scene near the start which was poignant beyond words. Go to 5.10 here where the British guy shouts 'Name!" to the Irishman:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC7MZSkEQEg


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭sock puppet


    Bambi wrote: »
    although it's biased, most of it is factually accurate. it also shows most of the pro treatyites as me feiners which has to be a good thing :)

    As far as I'm aware the civil war was fought over the failure to achieve a republic. The whole capitalists/socialists thing seems like a load of crap. The Labour Party were hardly committed republicans.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭Dionysus


    Christ just watching it for the first time in 3 years and that brings tears to my eyes just watching the Irish guys scream "Michael O'Sullivan is his name! He's 17 years of age! Michael O'Sullivan is his name!" while Mícheál Ó Súilleabháin was being beaten to death inside.

    Bastards.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,039 ✭✭✭bazmaiden


    I laughed through the whole film because of their stupid accents.

    you obviously weren't paying too much attention to the subject matter if you laughed the whole way through


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,689 ✭✭✭✭OutlawPete




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,477 ✭✭✭grenache


    I know it's not a true story as such. The characters and plot are fictional, however based in a real situation.

    But how realistic is it?

    Does it portray the Irish as romantic, idealistic resistance fighters who take to violence only because there is no other self-respecting course, while portraying the British as blood-thirsty, sadistic, murdering psychopaths? How accurate is all this? Is the movie fair and balanced, or is it biased?
    You do realise the 'Brits' in question in this film were the Black and Tans? The most savage group of armed mercenaries ever to set foot in this country.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And here come the 700 YEARSSSS brigade.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    As far as I'm aware the civil war was fought over the failure to achieve a republic. The whole capitalists/socialists thing seems like a load of crap. The Labour Party were hardly committed republicans.

    There was a big socialist movement in Ireland in the early 1900's. Sure look at the founders of many of the trade unions and look at some of the early big republican names, James Connolly etc.

    Even in 1916 there was lots of commie bollox thrown into the mix because they needed to get the workers army involved.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭Moomoo1


    Dionysus wrote: »
    There was one scene near the start which was poignant beyond words. Go to 5.10 here where the British guy shouts 'Name!" to the Irishman:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC7MZSkEQEg

    I found the fighting between the Irish much more disturbing. Foreign invaders are one thing, a civil war that makes former neighbours and/or relatives kill each other is quite another.

    and the Socialist element was there - quite a lot of the 'opposition' in the Civil war had links to the International.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    As far as I'm aware the civil war was fought over the failure to achieve a republic. The whole capitalists/socialists thing seems like a load of crap. The Labour Party were hardly committed republicans.

    It's not suprising given Loachs' background. I do remember reading tom barry's ( I think) thoughts around the treaty saying that even before the treaty the guys in dublin running much of the provisional government had started getting used to the idea of power and were looking after their own interests already. Personally I think one of the reasons Ireland wound up such a conservative and "unsocial" country was because we lost so many progressive thinkers due to their opposition to the treaty. Probably much like Spain after their civil war.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,456 ✭✭✭✭Mr Benevolent


    grenache wrote: »
    You do realise the 'Brits' in question in this film were the Black and Tans? The most savage group of armed mercenaries ever to set foot in this country.

    What about Cromwell's lot?
    Actually Cromwell is very misrepresented in Irish history, but let's not ruin a good UK-bashing thread with facts!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭sock puppet


    Rojomcdojo wrote: »
    There was a big socialist movement in Ireland in the early 1900's. Sure look at the founders of many of the trade unions and look at some of the early big republican names, James Connolly etc.

    Even in 1916 there was lots of commie bollox thrown into the mix because they needed to get the workers army involved.

    But is there any evidence it had anything to do with the split in the movement? Again, the Labour Party didn't walk out on the Dail with the rest of those who disagreed with the Treaty.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,477 ✭✭✭grenache


    Confab wrote: »
    What about Cromwell's lot?
    Actually Cromwell is very misrepresented in Irish history, but let's not ruin a good UK-bashing thread with facts!
    sorry, i meant one of..


Advertisement