Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

NASA say defunct satellite due to plunge to earth

12346»

Comments

  • #152
    thecommander
    Registered Users Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭thecommander


    And the video on here is of our old friend, the Chinese lantern.

    http://www.space.com/13078-nasa-uars-satellite-falls-earth.html


  • #153
    Popoutman
    Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭Popoutman


    Captain Chaos wrote: »
    We can't even see the ISS pass over when it's in the Earth's shadow.
    I can, and I have. It appears as about an 8th magnitude star for up to 2 minutes after going into shadow. I've been able to follow it with a hand-guided 6" Dob and a pair of 15x70 binos.


  • #154
    kraggy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,414 ✭✭✭kraggy


    I've no real concept of orbit so can I ask a few questions?

    1. Why did this fall to earth and other objects in Orbit are still up there? i.e. what force keeps stuff up there as opposed to falling back down here?

    2. What force moves stuff along and around the world? What propels the satellites forward?

    3. What would happen to a person if they were released into orbit from a shuttle with no suit or an astronaut's suit broke open?

    Thanks.


  • #155
    FrostyJack
    Registered Users Posts: 1,726 ✭✭✭FrostyJack


    kraggy wrote: »
    I've no real concept of orbit so can I ask a few questions?

    1. Why did this fall to earth and other objects in Orbit are still up there? i.e. what force keeps stuff up there as opposed to falling back down here?

    2. What force moves stuff along and around the world? What propels the satellites forward?

    3. What would happen to a person if they were released into orbit from a shuttle with no suit or an astronaut's suit broke open?

    Thanks.

    1. It drifted out of orbital velocity and there wasn't enough propellant left on board to put it back into a stable orbit. NASA decided to use what fuel was left to push it to Earth quicker to stop it hitting the likes of other satellites in the future. Orbital velocity is the velocity needed to achieve balance between gravity's pull on the satellite and the inertia of the satellite's motion, this is what keeps them up in space.

    2. Gravity and velocity (as stated above). This gives more detail. http://science.howstuffworks.com/satellite3.htm

    3. They would die very quickly. They would be exposed to vacuum conditions, so they wouldn't be able to breath. If somehow you were able to breath you would freeze to death in short time. Without the pressure suit the body would expand as well (because there is less pressure in space), but I think this is survivable.


  • #156
    jumpjack
    Registered Users Posts: 131 ✭✭jumpjack


    kraggy wrote: »
    I've no real concept of orbit so can I ask a few questions?

    1. Why did this fall to earth and other objects in Orbit are still up there? i.e. what force keeps stuff up there as opposed to falling back down here?
    The rocket which launches a satellite gives it enough speed to acquire needed centrifugal acceleration to "balance" earth gravity. Then, no more engine is required,as in the vacuum the satellite can't be slowed down by air friction.

    Actually, some molecules of air are still present at the satellite altitude (300 km), and after some years travelling at 30'000 km/h, the satellite is slowed down a bit; centrifugal force then becomes lower, hence gravity attacts more, hence satellite goes down more , it encounters more air molecules, which slow down it even more, so it goes down more....
    At the end, it reenters atmosphere and burns up.
    2. What force moves stuff along and around the world? What propels the satellites forward?
    No force is needed if no friction is present.
    3. What would happen to a person if they were released into orbit from a shuttle with no suit or an astronaut's suit broke open?
    Various theories around: boiling blood, body explosion, immediate freezing,... :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • #157
    Peanut
    Registered Users Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭Peanut


    kraggy wrote: »
    2. What force moves stuff along and around the world? What propels the satellites forward?

    It's not at all obvious where inertial force originates from. There's an interesting page on it here,
    ...Inertial reaction forces are instantaneous; there's no doubt whatsoever about that. When you push on something, it pushes back on you immediately. If they're caused chiefly by the most distant matter in the universe, how can that be?

    Only three answers to this question seem to be available:

    * Relativity notwithstanding, the force really is propagated instantaneously. The occurrence of so-called "non-local" interactions in quantum phenomena (reported even in the popular press of late) might make such a scheme seem plausible.

    * Some sort of a local field, maybe not our A field, is really the cause of inertia.

    * When you push on an object a gravitational disturbance goes propagating off into either the past or the future. Out there in the past or future the disturbance makes the distant matter in the universe wiggle. The wiggling stuff out there makes up the currents that cause disturbances to propagate from the past or the future back to the object. They all arrive from the past or future just in time to produce the inertial reaction force you feel.

    ...the least implausible explanation of the origin of inertia is gravitational disturbances that propagate to and from the distant future out there.

    http://physics.fullerton.edu/~jimw/general/inertia/index.htm


  • #158
    emo72
    Registered Users Posts: 6,184 ✭✭✭emo72


    peanuts reply has just totally mindfecked me ^^^^^^^^^^^

    i never ever gave a moments thought to inertia. now its gonna totally play on my mind. forever.


  • #159
    Peanut
    Registered Users Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭Peanut


    Hahah :)

    Sorry :)

    How about we decide that stuff just moves mmmkay? :pac:


  • #160
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭[Deleted User]


    UARS re-entry update video

    http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogallery/index.html?media_id=113411791


  • #161
    gbee
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭gbee


    Jake1 wrote: »
    UARS re-entry update video

    http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogallery/index.html?media_id=113411791

    Thanks, does this mean we must officially discount all the videos?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement