Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
20-08-2012, 21:45   #5026
Conway635
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by dublinman1990 View Post
Yes, the bus was roaring. I do get roaring buses sometimes on some routes.

Can I ask what any of this has to do with a thread on Network Direct?

If the above poster wishes to discuss his belief in "bad egg" drivers and "roaring buses" I'd imagine a new thread would be in order, at least this would allow me to read opinions on the network redesign without having to wade through this stuff.

C635
Conway635 is offline  
Advertisement
20-08-2012, 23:44   #5027
patrickbrophy18
Registered User
 
patrickbrophy18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dalkey
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conway635 View Post
Can I ask what any of this has to do with a thread on Network Direct?

If the above poster wishes to discuss his belief in "bad egg" drivers and "roaring buses" I'd imagine a new thread would be in order, at least this would allow me to read opinions on the network redesign without having to wade through this stuff.

C635
Too right! The last 10 or so pages seem to have been dominated with technical or trivial details about buses, RTPI and driver schedules. Each time I get a notification, I'm expecting some update from the Network Direct project, not some trivial, irrelevant or insignificant information.
patrickbrophy18 is offline  
21-08-2012, 00:24   #5028
Cookie_Monster
Registered User
 
Cookie_Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NP, NI, NZ
Posts: 17,293
Send a message via Skype™ to Cookie_Monster
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickbrophy18 View Post
Too right! The last 10 or so pages seem to have been dominated with technical or trivial details about buses, RTPI and driver schedules. Each time I get a notification, I'm expecting some update from the Network Direct project, not some trivial, irrelevant or insignificant information.
true enough but that said ND seems to have completely stalled with little happening these days anyway
Cookie_Monster is offline  
21-08-2012, 03:23   #5029
dfx-
Moderator
 
dfx-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Solvency
Posts: 7,248
Mod: Soccer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conway635 View Post
Can I ask what any of this has to do with a thread on Network Direct?

If the above poster wishes to discuss his belief in "bad egg" drivers and "roaring buses" I'd imagine a new thread would be in order, at least this would allow me to read opinions on the network redesign without having to wade through this stuff.

C635
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickbrophy18 View Post
Too right! The last 10 or so pages seem to have been dominated with technical or trivial details about buses, RTPI and driver schedules. Each time I get a notification, I'm expecting some update from the Network Direct project, not some trivial, irrelevant or insignificant information.
Well I'd argue that a whole lot of things with Dublin Bus has everything to do with Network Direct in some form. Like A2000's posts on the ridiculousness of the 40.

The 40 brought in by Network Direct. Or the familiarity of drivers with routes chopped and changed by Network Direct. Or the GTs and retirement of RVs enabled by route or service chops by Network Direct. Rosters. Punctuality. Holidays. Maintenance. Customers. Timetables. Subsidies. New orders. It's such a blister on the surface that you'd have a shorter list of things that hasn't to do with Network Direct.

Last edited by dfx-; 21-08-2012 at 03:45.
dfx- is online now  
Thanks from:
21-08-2012, 13:53   #5030
Bazzer2
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by lxflyer View Post
Phase 1 is long finished - that was the implementation of the changes on the Stillorgan, Blanchardstown and Lucan corridors.

All that is left to be implemented as a result of the network review are the changes to:

Howth Road/Malahide, Swords/North County Dublin, and some orbital/outer city local suburban routes.
The Lucan corridor is long finished? What happened to the re-routing of the 66 by Parson Street and the extension of the 67 to Moyglare?
Bazzer2 is offline  
Advertisement
21-08-2012, 14:01   #5031
donspeekinglesh
Registered User
 
donspeekinglesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 368
Dublin Bus said they can't afford to extend the routes.
donspeekinglesh is online now  
21-08-2012, 14:56   #5032
Ben D Bus
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 714
So is the change to the 79 off the agenda now or what?
Ben D Bus is online now  
21-08-2012, 15:06   #5033
Conway635
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben D Bus View Post
So is the change to the 79 off the agenda now or what?
That should still be on the agenda, as it will merge two routes and give an overall saving in vehicles/staff.

What is delaying it is an issue around the safety of the proposed terminal - a pull-in is needed.

C635
Conway635 is offline  
21-08-2012, 15:45   #5034
Joshycat
Registered User
 
Joshycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Dublin
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by donspeekinglesh View Post
Dublin Bus said they can't afford to extend the routes.
Does this mean route 29 to Baldoyle is cancelled
Joshycat is offline  
Advertisement
21-08-2012, 16:03   #5035
end of the road
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conway635 View Post
That should still be on the agenda, as it will merge two routes and give an overall saving in vehicles/staff.
and will become another unrelyable cross city route. fantastic. the longer the implementation is delayed the better as far as i'm concerned.
end of the road is offline  
21-08-2012, 16:24   #5036
Bazzer2
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by donspeekinglesh View Post
Dublin Bus said they can't afford to extend the routes.
Where have they said this?
Bazzer2 is offline  
21-08-2012, 16:34   #5037
donspeekinglesh
Registered User
 
donspeekinglesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshycat View Post
Does this mean route 29 to Baldoyle is cancelled
I just mean that was the reason for not extending the 67 route. No idea about other routes.

Actually looks like the changes to the 66 will happen.
donspeekinglesh is online now  
Thanks from:
21-08-2012, 16:56   #5038
lxflyer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,786
What DB have said is that due to a combination of reduced demand and lack of funding, they are not implementing new routes such as the 166 and 175 (ref their FB/twitter some months back).

You can extend that to any changes that require additional buses - that does not mean that changes such as the 66 and 67 extensions will not happen as they ought not to require additional buses (the original changes left sufficient running time for the extensions). To be fair these are minor changes in the overall context of the corridor.

Similarly the Howth Road changes ought to be a net saving in vehicles - why it hasn't happened I don't know.

The 79/27b merger is on hold pending the construction of a bus terminus on Oscsr Traynor Road
lxflyer is offline  
21-08-2012, 17:00   #5039
KD345
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshycat View Post
Does this mean route 29 to Baldoyle is cancelled
The 29 extension is still very much happening, it's just taking a bit longer than expected.
KD345 is offline  
Thanks from:
21-08-2012, 23:22   #5040
Carawaystick
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: exiled in North Co. Dublin
Posts: 3,315
I think the bus drivers are being unnnecessarily harsh on the no.4 passenger, who is maybe being unreasonable in their expectations also.

I think the vast majority of passengers who see a normal Dublin Bus ( not green, not red, not beige, Door at the front etc) would expect the bus to work and any issues in performance due to the driver.

Now interested users and drivers know that busses are unreliable and liable to malfunction/breakages. However if the bus breaks down, without cutting out the passenger is not going to know without the Driver telling the customers. I'm fairly sure DB management are sure as shure not gonna tell customers why. And leave the implication Drivers are to blame.
Communication is cheap, flexible and easy to do. but it's not done well on average
Carawaystick is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search