Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
10-05-2012, 14:04   #76
highlydebased
Registered User
 
highlydebased's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayotom View Post
with a better catchment area due to lack of Roads etc.
I think that is an oxymoron.
highlydebased is online now  
Thanks from:
Advertisement
10-05-2012, 16:54   #77
mayotom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Marbella, Espaņa
Posts: 652
Send a message via MSN to mayotom Send a message via Skype™ to mayotom
Quote:
Originally Posted by highlydebased View Post
I think that is an oxymoron.
or a paradox, the point been that the Shannon Catchment area has a much higher population, but it is also much more accessible to the larger airports like DUB and ORK. Therefore Knock with a smaller population would still have more potential passengers..
mayotom is offline  
10-05-2012, 17:12   #78
clintondaly
Registered User
 
clintondaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Clare,but more importantly, from Cork
Posts: 483
Ryanair will keep a route open no matter where as long as it makes money.

Whats going to happen if the proposed airport in Athlone goes ahead?

As for ideas as to what to do with Shannon,yes Cargo is an option as is the humanitarian hub,why not have a facility like Westpark with similiar Tax incentives and take some of the Leasing companies out of the IFSC.

Or,how about using Shannon as a hub for Transatlantic Ryanair like Airlines.Ship everyone from Europe(using secondary airports) into Shannon,use the preclearance facilities,everyone gets on to B757/767 A330/340 etc. etc and fly them all to secondary airports in the US,feasible?
clintondaly is online now  
10-05-2012, 17:40   #79
A320
Registered User
 
A320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by clintondaly View Post
Whats going to happen if the proposed airport in Athlone goes ahead?
Huh????
A320 is offline  
10-05-2012, 17:46   #80
MYOB
Registered User
 
MYOB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 17,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by A320 View Post
Huh????
It won't happen.

Some private developer has suggested building a "Midlands International" airport/ cargo hub (why would anyone hub where there is zero native traffic?) for near Clara.
MYOB is offline  
Thanks from:
Advertisement
10-05-2012, 18:09   #81
kub
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 947
Quote:
Originally Posted by clintondaly View Post
Ryanair will keep a route open no matter where as long as it makes money.

Whats going to happen if the proposed airport in Athlone goes ahead?

As for ideas as to what to do with Shannon,yes Cargo is an option as is the humanitarian hub,why not have a facility like Westpark with similiar Tax incentives and take some of the Leasing companies out of the IFSC.

Or,how about using Shannon as a hub for Transatlantic Ryanair like Airlines.Ship everyone from Europe(using secondary airports) into Shannon,use the preclearance facilities,everyone gets on to B757/767 A330/340 etc. etc and fly them all to secondary airports in the US,feasible?
Firstly, love the Clare but more importantly from Cork , great ideas hopefully someone down in Shannon reads that. But as mentioned, Airport in Athlone, Huh?
kub is offline  
(2) thanks from:
10-05-2012, 18:46   #82
clintondaly
Registered User
 
clintondaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Clare,but more importantly, from Cork
Posts: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by kub View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by clintondaly View Post
Ryanair will keep a route open no matter where as long as it makes money.

Whats going to happen if the proposed airport in Athlone goes ahead?

As for ideas as to what to do with Shannon,yes Cargo is an option as is the humanitarian hub,why not have a facility like Westpark with similiar Tax incentives and take some of the Leasing companies out of the IFSC.

Or,how about using Shannon as a hub for Transatlantic Ryanair like Airlines.Ship everyone from Europe(using secondary airports) into Shannon,use the preclearance facilities,everyone gets on to B757/767 A330/340 etc. etc and fly them all to secondary airports in the US,feasible?
Firstly, love the Clare but more importantly from Cork , great ideas hopefully someone down in Shannon reads that. But as mentioned, Airport in Athlone, Huh?
Answered just above,part of the submission for the Chinese manufacturing showcase facility in Athlone.
clintondaly is online now  
10-05-2012, 19:09   #83
MYOB
Registered User
 
MYOB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 17,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by clintondaly View Post
Answered just above,part of the submission for the Chinese manufacturing showcase facility in Athlone.
It'd make more sense if it was part of that - but it was suggested before it! I despair at some of the boomtime gibberish this country came up with...
MYOB is offline  
(2) thanks from:
13-05-2012, 20:19   #84
roundymac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Near Cork.
Posts: 764
Quote:
Originally Posted by clintondaly View Post
Answered just above,part of the submission for the Chinese manufacturing showcase facility in Athlone.
An Taisce have lodged an objection to that proposal. first of many I would suspect.
roundymac is offline  
Advertisement
13-05-2012, 22:35   #85
Suits
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by clintondaly View Post

Or,how about using Shannon as a hub for Transatlantic Ryanair like Airlines.Ship everyone from Europe(using secondary airports) into Shannon,use the preclearance facilities,everyone gets on to B757/767 A330/340 etc. etc and fly them all to secondary airports in the US,feasible?
"Ryanair" type airlines dont like wasting money...which this would be. If you flew to a secondary airport in the US chances are it would not have a massive amount of foreign/European traffic so there wouldnt be too much of a que at immigration. The pre-clearance was set up to try and cut down on ques in the major US airports...the ones at the secondary airports are less.

In any case this would be a re-emergence of the dreaded "Shannon Stopover" which in name and appearance would not be a great PR move....
Suits is offline  
13-05-2012, 22:50   #86
Tenger
Registered User
 
Tenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Pale
Posts: 2,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suits View Post
.....If you flew to a secondary airport in the US chances are it would not have a massive amount of foreign/European traffic so there wouldnt be too much of a que at immigration. The pre-clearance was set up to try and cut down on ques in the major US airports...the ones at the secondary airports are less.....
Actually the SNN/DUB CBP pre-clearance combined with the Open Skies agreement between USA/EU allows access to any/and all airports in the USA.

Without the CBP pre-clearance any international flight into the USA must operate into a limited number of internationally equipped airports. In theory you could fly from SNN into La Guardia (LGA) thus by-passing both Newark and JFK for flights into New York. (LGA currently does not have direct flights to/from Europe)

Avoiding the queues in EWR/JFK/BOS/ORD/PHL is just a secondary benefit!!
Tenger is online now  
13-05-2012, 23:33   #87
Suits
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenger View Post
Actually the SNN/DUB CBP pre-clearance combined with the Open Skies agreement between USA/EU allows access to any/and all airports in the USA.

Without the CBP pre-clearance any international flight into the USA must operate into a limited number of internationally equipped airports. In theory you could fly from SNN into La Guardia (LGA) thus by-passing both Newark and JFK for flights into New York. (LGA currently does not have direct flights to/from Europe)

Avoiding the queues in EWR/JFK/BOS/ORD/PHL is just a secondary benefit!!
I cant see any airline stopping in Shannon though. If "Ryanatlantic" wanted to fly to the US I'd imagine they'd sort immigration issues at the departure/destination airports as they would most likely get a lot of traffic from the airline. They'd create an immigration booth in LGA, Buffalo, Midway, Oakland, Providence etc I'd imagine if multiple flights a day were coming in from across european bases and there wasnt one already.
Suits is offline  
14-05-2012, 08:41   #88
Dacian
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 739
Actually Suits, any LCC across the Atlantic is restricted to the airports it can serve.

While Open Skies allows EU airlines to start routes to any US city, they are still limited by US CBP who do not have international facilities in every airport. And you cannot 'just sort out immigration at departure/arrival airport' for the USA. EI, who are a very well established EU-US airline, have been in discussions with the CBP for over a year about some of their difficulties with the current set-up.

Ireland is the only country (other than Canada and Bermuda) to have such facilities. This is a huge advantage, and the entire logic supporting SNN as a possible TransAtlantic LCC hub operation. In practise only flights from Ireland can take full advantage of the EU-USA Open Skies agreement.
Dacian is offline  
14-05-2012, 09:23   #89
Davidth88
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tea 1000 View Post
But expensive parking dissuades passengers and expensive fees dissuades airlines.
I looked at this , parking at Shannon is nearly 2 euro per day MORE EXPENSIVE than Dublin , thats mad . Interestingly it's the same sort of price as Cork and knock.

I am surprised that the provincial airports don't undercut Dublin .

I think Shannon is missing out on a trick with the US customs / Immigration . Look at the BA001 flight form London City .

They should be talking to LH/AF and others and see if similar flights could be marketed.
Davidth88 is online now  
14-05-2012, 09:46   #90
urajoke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidth88 View Post
.

I think Shannon is missing out on a trick with the US customs / Immigration . Look at the BA001 flight form London City .

They should be talking to LH/AF and others and see if similar flights could be marketed.
First of all they would have to find the French and German version of London City airport and then try and get AF/LH to fly from it.

I think you are missing the point with this route, it's very specific to one airport London City, right beside a major financial district on a dock with water on three sides and a very short runway. Why do you think BA haven't increased flights or started more ? WE ARE IN A GLOBAL FINANCIAL RECESSION. BA are very lucky to be still getting enough business travellers to keep this route running. It suits BA to operate this route as the flight needs to make a westbound stop anyway for fuel and it just happens that Shannon is so quiet that they have no problems with delays and it has US customs and Immigration so the passengers can fill the time productively while they refuel.

Airlines don't open routes because aviation enthusiasts thing they should.

People who live near Shannon should wake up and smell the coffee. The airports future is very limited and once again forcing/encouraging airlines to make unnecessary stopovers to keep it open and running is NOT the way to market yourself.

Last edited by urajoke; 14-05-2012 at 09:49.
urajoke is online now  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search