Boards.ie

walshb · 30-04-2012, 12:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boooourns

Surely it's worse the fact that Senchenko was the champ before that, a guy who was undefeated hiding in his own Country. Paulie destroyed him.
I'd imagine the other Welterweights are kicking themselves that they never travelled to fight him.

I've always enjoyed watching Paulie, he's pretty skillful and he's as brave as they come....the fight with Cotto springs to mind!

YES, I did mean to add this. Who got badly beaten by Paulie? This guy was the champ. And to win the title, I think, he beat a man that lost to Matthew Hatton.

Frankie Lee · 30-04-2012, 13:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boooourns

Surely it's worse the fact that Senchenko was the champ before that, a guy who was undefeated hiding in his own Country. Paulie destroyed him.
I'd imagine the other Welterweights are kicking themselves that they never travelled to fight him.

In Senchenko's 4 title fights not one of his opponents were rated in Boxrec's top 40, with two of them being rated outside the worlds top 100.
I know boxrecs ratings can be ridiculous but still the WBA have been a disgrace in sanctioning them.

Kell Brook vs Paulie would be a good fight and bound to be a good moneyspinner for both fighters.

ToiletFusion · 01-05-2012, 00:32

Be a good fight for Kell, Paulie like the boys mentioned is pretty skillful but he's as weak as water. He's not troubling anyone of worth.

I'd rate Khan a fair bit higher than the likes of Paulie...

Maravilla33 · 01-05-2012, 08:21

I'm yet to be fully convinced by Brook but he would beat Paulie quite easily. I fancied Paulie to outbox Hatton and even thought he might beat Khan. Brooks technically better than both and hits harder to boot. Late stoppage for Kell in this one for me.

clubwelly · 01-05-2012, 23:01

Hey fair play to Paulie. Aside from the fact that there's too many belts and titles of each belt (interim, super, diamond) he went to the Ukraine and got the victory. I took a liking to the guy after the balls he showed to take the punishment in the Cotto fight. He did himself no favours in the fight he had in man city's ground with the hair going everywhere but gotta admire this victory.

Special K would beat him. Has just as fast hands and I think wud hit harder. Can't see it happening cos they're tiring to line up Devon Alexander Paulie (both golden boy)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

01-05-2012, 00:32	#18
ToiletFusion Registered User Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Kerry Posts: 987 Adverts \| Friends	Be a good fight for Kell, Paulie like the boys mentioned is pretty skillful but he's as weak as water. He's not troubling anyone of worth. I'd rate Khan a fair bit higher than the likes of Paulie...

01-05-2012, 08:21	#19
Maravilla33 Registered User Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 377 Adverts \| Friends	I'm yet to be fully convinced by Brook but he would beat Paulie quite easily. I fancied Paulie to outbox Hatton and even thought he might beat Khan. Brooks technically better than both and hits harder to boot. Late stoppage for Kell in this one for me.

01-05-2012, 23:01	#20
clubwelly Registered User Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 464 Adverts \| Friends	Hey fair play to Paulie. Aside from the fact that there's too many belts and titles of each belt (interim, super, diamond) he went to the Ukraine and got the victory. I took a liking to the guy after the balls he showed to take the punishment in the Cotto fight. He did himself no favours in the fight he had in man city's ground with the hair going everywhere but gotta admire this victory. Special K would beat him. Has just as fast hands and I think wud hit harder. Can't see it happening cos they're tiring to line up Devon Alexander Paulie (both golden boy)