Boards.ie

**Adam Khor** · 28-04-2012, 19:09

It's conclusion seems to be that "the morphology of theropod skulls is strongly associated with dietary preference as well as phylogenetic affinity". Or am I just too slow to understand it?

http://www.app.pan.pl/archive/publis...110145_acc.pdf

Rubecula · 29-04-2012, 00:15

I am not sure what conclusion to make from that, I dozed off halfway through reading it. No insult intended to the two authors, but it was just a bit too long winded for me. And i was tired when I clicked on the link.

28-04-2012, 19:09	#1
Adam Khor Moderator Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,562 Adverts \| Friends Mod: Palaeontology, Zoology	Am I wrong to think this paper is pointless? It's conclusion seems to be that "the morphology of theropod skulls is strongly associated with dietary preference as well as phylogenetic affinity". Or am I just too slow to understand it? http://www.app.pan.pl/archive/publis...110145_acc.pdf

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

29-04-2012, 00:15	#2
Rubecula Registered User Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Anglesey, North Wales. Where mankind fears to go. Posts: 2,653 Adverts \| Friends	I am not sure what conclusion to make from that, I dozed off halfway through reading it. No insult intended to the two authors, but it was just a bit too long winded for me. And i was tired when I clicked on the link.