Quote:
Originally Posted by BaZmO*
You can generally take a fairly educated guess of which poster will fail to put up their recipe and not bother to reply to PMs.
|
Honestly, you can't. It's impossible to tell. I've been *convinced* someone will fail to post a recipe, and then they've gone on to post a fabulous, popular one. Equally, I've seen very reliable posters pull out at the 11th hour.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mellor
Maybe have a submission deadline a few days early. The forum is set to unapprove new threads. Say by monday night, posters should have submitted thier recipe/thread. And on friday you (the mods) approve the new recipe. If they miss the monday night deadline, then they get a ban and it gives you time to organise a stand in by friday. That way, the recipes go up regularly every friday even when its not the scheduled person.
There's no reason why people can't post threads a week or two early and they can sit there unapproved until they are ready to go
|
This is a possibility. We'd have to soft-delete them though, and then bump them when we restore them. But it's a good idea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by confusticated
If forgetting or not planning ahead is an issue, maybe don't take signups for the full year at once, maybe do 3 or 4 months at a time? Although this does mean a lot more work for mods I know, so maybe not!
|
We thought about doing this year in 2 halves, but it's very complicated. I'm moving country and starting a Masters this summer, so there's so way I'd have time to organise the whole thing at that point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChewChew
I don't think to have the recipes submitted at an earlier time (say Monday for Friday) is very fair on the mods. It means then the responsibility is passed to them, and they have to be free on that Friday to chase the poster and then post their recipe because they are unable to do it themselves for whatever reason. At the end of the day, we as the users of tCC, signed up to this so it is our responsibility to make sure we make note of our date and post when we have agreed to!
|
This, to a degree. It is the poster's responsibility, and we already chase people a lot. Unless we ask the next, say, 4 posters to submit their recipes as soon as possible, and soft-delete them until the correct week.
Quote:
|
I think maybe an idea could be if someone is a no show, they don't get considered for anymore years. That's it. You blew it.
|
I certainly agree with this. Although, if someone fails to post a recipe, they almost never sign up again the next year anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by reallyrose
Stand-in recipes are a good idea. Perhaps, now, this week, (or whenever you have time! <3) mods could contact the folks that said they'd be available in case of drops outs. Then a little stock of recipe posts could be kept somewhere all mods can access it, on pastebin or similar. If there's a no show, then a recipe can be seamlessly posted! Hurrah! I'm sure other posters would also be willing to contribute. At the end of the year, if there's recipe posts left, they could be posted all at once. An omnibus edition!
|
I like this. We might consider asking stand-ins to actually post their recipes as soon as they can, and soft-delete them until they're needed.