Household charge letter from "McCann Fitzgerald Solicitors" - Page 2 - uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
Thread Tools Search this Thread
01-03-2012, 01:24   #16
Closed Account
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,435
Originally Posted by Scealta_saol View Post

Whoever circulated this wasn't thinking with a full deck of cards... it's an offence to pretend to be a solicitor...
Thats interesting , I never knew that.
Delancey is offline  
01-03-2012, 08:21   #17
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,267
Yup s56 Solicitors Act 1954 as amended.
Prohibition on pretending to be solicitor.

56.—(1) A person who is not a solicitor shall not pretend to be a solicitor or take or use any name, title, addition or description or make any representation or demand implying that he is a solicitor.

The current fine for the offence is in the region of €4,000. Obviously you would also be liable on an almost unlimited basis to anyone who suffered damage in reliance on your representations.
johnfás is offline  
(2) thanks from:
01-03-2012, 08:24   #18
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,719
Originally Posted by Tom Young View Post
Surely that is straying into the provision of legal advice (on a fake piece of legal advice)!!!!!!!
Marcusm is offline  
01-03-2012, 12:28   #19
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 190
Originally Posted by PcAngel View Post
Is it legally correct?
Think about it for more than two seconds, and maybe less than seven.

Then think about whether rapists can avoid "statute" because they don't "consent" to it.

You'll get your answer.
Avatargh is offline  
01-03-2012, 14:05   #20
jargon buster
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 267

Rob Menard posted it on David Ickes and the thread got locked and he got banned once the mods found out about the solicitors investigation.
jargon buster is offline  
01-03-2012, 16:21   #21
Boondock Saint
Lockstep's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Galway
Posts: 9,118
I emailed them about this and got the following reply

Thank you very much for getting in touch and bringing this email to our attention - a number of people have done so. The email did not originate with this firm and does not express any legal opinion from this firm. We are investigating how our name has come to appear on the email.

Thank you again.
They've since released the press release saying it's nothing to do with them.

It bugs me that people are willing to fabricate legal info to further political points. God help those who believe this stuff.
Lockstep is offline  
(3) thanks from:
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Remove Text Formatting

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Share Tweet