Boards.ie

smiddyboy · 09-07-2009, 19:48

On Eircom 7.6Mb @ 19:45

ping 85.8.132.222

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 46ms

ping 85.114.152.67

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 67ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 67ms

ping 85.236.96.22

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=121

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 45ms

Redisle · 09-07-2009, 20:27

IBB Breeze 4mb.
20.25

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=56
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=56
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 29ms

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=49
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=49
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=49
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 49ms, Average = 46ms

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=122
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=122
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=122
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 33ms

TheMeatMan · 09-07-2009, 21:03

Time: 21:01
Eircom
3mb

Pinging 85.8.132.222
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Success rate is 100 percent (4/4)
round-trip min/avg/max = 20/25/30 msec

Pinging 85.114.152.67
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Success rate is 100 percent (4/4)
round-trip min/avg/max = 30/32/40 msec

Pinging 85.236.96.22
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Success rate is 100 percent (4/4)
round-trip min/avg/max = 20/20/20 msec

z0oT · 09-07-2009, 22:54

Eircom 7mb
22:54

Code:

mark@mark-laptop:~$ ping 85.8.132.222 -c 4
PING 85.8.132.222 (85.8.132.222) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=53.1 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=52.5 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=53.2 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=53.6 ms

--- 85.8.132.222 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 52.587/53.157/53.623/0.406 ms

Code:

mark@mark-laptop:~$ ping 85.114.152.67 -c 4
PING 85.114.152.67 (85.114.152.67) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=71.3 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=69.3 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=72.6 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=68.5 ms

--- 85.114.152.67 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 68.560/70.463/72.623/1.602 ms

Code:

mark@mark-laptop:~$ ping 85.236.96.22 -c 4
PING 85.236.96.22 (85.236.96.22) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=121 time=49.8 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=121 time=50.3 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=121 time=50.1 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=4 ttl=121 time=50.1 ms

--- 85.236.96.22 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 2999ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 49.821/50.105/50.365/0.249 ms

Some_Person · 10-07-2009, 07:05

Disregard my comment about Alphawave fixing the speed/latency, it's gone down the toilet again.

**Magnet: Rory** · 10-07-2009, 15:31

Thank you all for participating in our survey!

The winner (out of a hat) of the €20 voucher is Fluffy.Death !!!

Fluffy.Death - I’ll PM you now and get details of an address to post out the voucher.

I would say keep the survey going, gamers should know what companies or ISP's have good pings as low ping times are a must have for most if not all online games.

We'll post the results soon.

Dardania · 14-07-2009, 11:43

Just thinking, would it be an idea to expand the scope of the survey to include PlaySyation Network & Xbox Live? Quite a few people game on their consoles rather than on their desktops...

if anyones interested in following up on this I'll do a bit of an exercise into finding out what IP addresses to ping. So far for the PS3 I've found:

deu01.ps3.download.playstation.net
zeus.dl.playstation.net

although I think they're only the firmware update check server & the login to the PSN page rather thanstraight up gaming servers...

**Magnet: Rory** · 14-07-2009, 11:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dardania

Just thinking, would it be an idea to expand the scope of the survey to include PlaySyation Network & Xbox Live? Quite a few people game on their consoles rather than on their desktops...

if anyones interested in following up on this I'll do a bit of an exercise into finding out what IP addresses to ping. So far for the PS3 I've found:

deu01.ps3.download.playstation.net
zeus.dl.playstation.net

although I think they're only the firmware update check server & the login to the PSN page rather thanstraight up gaming servers...

By all means, we would love to see it continue.

**Spear** · 14-07-2009, 11:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dardania

Just thinking, would it be an idea to expand the scope of the survey to include PlaySyation Network & Xbox Live? Quite a few people game on their consoles rather than on their desktops...

if anyones interested in following up on this I'll do a bit of an exercise into finding out what IP addresses to ping. So far for the PS3 I've found:

deu01.ps3.download.playstation.net
zeus.dl.playstation.net

although I think they're only the firmware update check server & the login to the PSN page rather thanstraight up gaming servers...

DNS names like those are potentially a bad idea, since they're often geo-balanced.

Dardania · 14-07-2009, 11:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spear

DNS names like those are potentially a bad idea, since they're often geo-balanced.

you're probably rihgt - the zeus one is returning an akami address...

I mustfigure out some way of sniffing the ip address my ps3 connects to through the router - any ideas of software to do that? I have an old hub (not switch)

chris254 · 11-05-2010, 20:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnet (Rory)

By all means, we would love to see it continue.

fastcom sligo
8.23pm

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=152ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 91ms, Maximum = 152ms, Average = 110ms

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=44
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=44
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=44
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=44

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 78ms, Maximum = 134ms, Average = 100ms

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=114
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=207ms TTL=114
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=114
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=114

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 73ms, Maximum = 207ms, Average = 140ms

Xennon · 11-05-2010, 20:50

Eircon;
8:50pm
Caherconlish Limerick

ping -c 10 85.8.132.222
PING 85.8.132.222 (85.8.132.222): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=57.934 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=59.608 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=58.965 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=67.209 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.681 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=76.707 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=91.441 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=62.914 ms

--- 85.8.132.222 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 20% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 47.681/65.307/91.441/12.550 ms

ping -c 10 85.114.152.67
PING 85.114.152.67 (85.114.152.67): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=59.219 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=64.293 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=69.041 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=72.203 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=68.042 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=71.666 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=68.469 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=58.347 ms

--- 85.114.152.67 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 20% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 58.347/66.410/72.203/4.952 ms

ping -c 10 85.236.96.22
PING 85.236.96.22 (85.236.96.22): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=0 ttl=121 time=51.902 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=121 time=51.163 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=121 time=53.348 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=121 time=53.155 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=5 ttl=121 time=40.982 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=6 ttl=121 time=53.646 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=7 ttl=121 time=59.488 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=8 ttl=121 time=58.118 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=9 ttl=121 time=62.805 ms

--- 85.236.96.22 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 10% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 40.982/53.845/62.805/5.846 ms

Next door to the exchange too!!

Thanks Rory.

Calebmcd · 11-05-2010, 23:30

UTV 8Mb
23:30

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=55

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=121

10-07-2009, 15:31	#51
Magnet: Rory Verified representative Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Dublin Posts: 2,103 Adverts \| Friends	Thank you all Thank you all for participating in our survey! The winner (out of a hat) of the €20 voucher is Fluffy.Death !!! Fluffy.Death - I’ll PM you now and get details of an address to post out the voucher. I would say keep the survey going, gamers should know what companies or ISP's have good pings as low ping times are a must have for most if not all online games. We'll post the results soon.

11-05-2010, 23:30	#58
Calebmcd Registered User Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Castlebar Posts: 340 Adverts \| Friends	UTV 8Mb 23:30 Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=52 Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=52 Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52 Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52 Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55 Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55 Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55 Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=55 Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=121 Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=121 Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=121 Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=121 Last edited by Calebmcd; 11-05-2010 at 23:34. Reason: I just saw the date on this thread...who bumped it?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

09-07-2009, 19:48	#46
smiddyboy Registered User Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Johnstown, Co Kilkenny Posts: 75 Adverts \| Friends	On Eircom 7.6Mb @ 19:45 ping 85.8.132.222 Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55 Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55 Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=55 Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55 Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 46ms ping 85.114.152.67 Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59 Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59 Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59 Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59 Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 67ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 67ms ping 85.236.96.22 Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=121 Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=121 Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=121 Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=121 Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 45ms

09-07-2009, 20:27	#47
Redisle Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Cork Posts: 1,782 Adverts \| Friends	IBB Breeze 4mb. 20.25 Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=56 Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56 Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=56 Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss) Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 29ms Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=49 Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=49 Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=49 Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 49ms, Average = 46ms Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=122 Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=122 Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=122 Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=122 Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 33ms

09-07-2009, 21:03	#48
TheMeatMan Registered User Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 32 Adverts \| Friends	Time: 21:01 Eircom 3mb Pinging 85.8.132.222 Received reply Received reply Received reply Received reply Success rate is 100 percent (4/4) round-trip min/avg/max = 20/25/30 msec Pinging 85.114.152.67 Received reply Received reply Received reply Received reply Success rate is 100 percent (4/4) round-trip min/avg/max = 30/32/40 msec Pinging 85.236.96.22 Received reply Received reply Received reply Received reply Success rate is 100 percent (4/4) round-trip min/avg/max = 20/20/20 msec

10-07-2009, 07:05	#50
Some_Person Registered User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waterford Posts: 359 Adverts \| Friends	Disregard my comment about Alphawave fixing the speed/latency, it's gone down the toilet again.

14-07-2009, 11:43	#52
Dardania Registered User Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Nomadically vague Posts: 1,201 Adverts \| Friends	Just thinking, would it be an idea to expand the scope of the survey to include PlaySyation Network & Xbox Live? Quite a few people game on their consoles rather than on their desktops... if anyones interested in following up on this I'll do a bit of an exercise into finding out what IP addresses to ping. So far for the PS3 I've found: deu01.ps3.download.playstation.net zeus.dl.playstation.net although I think they're only the firmware update check server & the login to the PSN page rather thanstraight up gaming servers...

11-05-2010, 20:50	#57
Xennon Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 607 Adverts \| Friends	Eircon; 8:50pm Caherconlish Limerick ping -c 10 85.8.132.222 PING 85.8.132.222 (85.8.132.222): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=57.934 ms 64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=59.608 ms 64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=58.965 ms 64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=67.209 ms 64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.681 ms 64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=76.707 ms 64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=91.441 ms 64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=62.914 ms --- 85.8.132.222 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 20% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 47.681/65.307/91.441/12.550 ms ping -c 10 85.114.152.67 PING 85.114.152.67 (85.114.152.67): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=59.219 ms 64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=64.293 ms 64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=69.041 ms 64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=72.203 ms 64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=68.042 ms 64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=71.666 ms 64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=68.469 ms 64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=58.347 ms --- 85.114.152.67 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 20% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 58.347/66.410/72.203/4.952 ms ping -c 10 85.236.96.22 PING 85.236.96.22 (85.236.96.22): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=0 ttl=121 time=51.902 ms 64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=121 time=51.163 ms 64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=121 time=53.348 ms 64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=121 time=53.155 ms 64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=5 ttl=121 time=40.982 ms 64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=6 ttl=121 time=53.646 ms 64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=7 ttl=121 time=59.488 ms 64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=8 ttl=121 time=58.118 ms 64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=9 ttl=121 time=62.805 ms --- 85.236.96.22 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 10% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 40.982/53.845/62.805/5.846 ms Next door to the exchange too!! Thanks Rory.