Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Recovery from races

  • 09-06-2009 10:09pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭


    Hi all,

    Somebody sent me a PM asking about recovery after racing and when they should do a hard workout. It may help others so my answer is below:

    I picked this up from a foreign coach and I believe it to be spot on. For every mile you run in a race (at full effort), you need 1 day of recovery running + 1 more day before running a hard workout again.

    Example: You ran a 5k race (3 miles). That means you recovery run for 3 + 1 more day or 4 days. On your 4th day you can run a hard workout. If you don't feel good or fresh, wait another day.

    Example: You ran a 10k race (6 miles). Recovery run for 6 + 1 more day or 7 days. You can run a hard workout on the 7th day. If you don't feel fresh, wait another day or two.

    The rule of thumb regarding sub-max running in races (those who didnt run flat out) goes like this:

    5% below all-out effort = 3/4ths of normal recovery time;
    10% below all-out effort = 1/2 of normal recovery time;
    15% below all-out effort = 1/4th of normal recovery time.

    Tergat


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,983 ✭✭✭TheRoadRunner


    I think that's a good rule of thumb and I know plenty of vets and experienced runners who advocate that approach.

    For a marathon or half marathon I'd definitely follow that approach but around the 10k or 10 mile mark it can be hard to be sensible and take 7 or 11 days recovery as I find I recover quick enough after either distance. I know it's not a full recovery and that's why I think it's important to have somebody i.e coach to advise an athlete.


  • Registered Users Posts: 371 ✭✭AJCOT


    Sounds sensible, I must admit I always rest the day after a race though rarely for longer than that. Thanks for the advice.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,969 ✭✭✭buck65


    I am running the Achill half marathon on 4th July, would it be madness to run the Clare 10k a week before?
    (I am running aprox 20 miles per week at moment)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,236 ✭✭✭Abhainn


    buck65 wrote: »
    I am running the Achill half marathon on 4th July, would it be madness to run the Clare 10k a week before?
    (I am running aprox 20 miles per week at moment)

    No not madness. Which one is your top priority?
    If you were considering running both at 100% effort then it may not be so clever. You could use the 10K as a tempo / steady run pace and race the Achill event. Achill is a challenging half marathon. Best of luck


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,364 Mod ✭✭✭✭RacoonQueen


    So running Dublin AND New York would be a bad idea?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,969 ✭✭✭buck65


    Abhainn wrote: »
    No not madness. Which one is your top priority?
    If you were considering running both at 100% effort then it may not be so clever. You could use the 10K as a tempo / steady run pace and race the Achill event. Achill is a challenging half marathon. Best of luck

    Yeah maybe I will use it as a tempo run, the half mara is the priority, but because of the difficulty of the course I am not expecting to run a great time so was tempted to have a lash at the 10k!
    But on 2nd thoughts if I kept the first 5 miles at half mara pace and then push the last 1.2 miles it may be better?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,236 ✭✭✭Abhainn


    So running Dublin AND New York would be a bad idea?

    No reason not to run both if you have prepared properly and not try and PB in each. If you run DM easy, NY can be achieved also. I think there are a number of contributors here who have ran marathons very close to each other

    You could prepare by doing back to back long runs (doubles) on a few occasions, these aren't easy. For my Conn Ultra preparation this year I built up to a 24 and 21 milers at the weekend.

    Personally I love DM and will want to run it every year when it comes around. To run well in NY is on my plans next year but I don't want to drop Dublin either!



    .


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,236 ✭✭✭Abhainn


    buck65 wrote: »
    !
    But on 2nd thoughts if I kept the first 5 miles at half mara pace and then push the last 1.2 miles it may be better?

    Yes that's seems sensible and you would be nicely tuned up and in good form to crack those Achill hills


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,983 ✭✭✭TheRoadRunner


    Abhainn wrote: »
    No reason not to run both if you have prepared properly and not try and PB in each.

    I'd have to disagree here. It is probably possible to run both but to do yourself justice in both is near impossible IMO. If I were to do the 2, I would run my guts out in Dublin and jog/walk/enjoy NY, wouldn't even dream of chasing a time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,691 ✭✭✭cfitz


    Tergat, would you apply that advice to your top athletes? I would have thought that high mileage athletes would be safe to do a hard workout much sooner than that. For example, if we think of one of the good Irish middle distance guys, maybe someone like Mark Hanrahan - if he were to run a full effort 5 mile race on Sunday, he'd be best just to do recovery runs until Saturday?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,031 ✭✭✭Stupid_Private


    cfitz wrote: »
    Tergat, would you apply that advice to your top athletes? I would have thought that high mileage athletes would be safe to do a hard workout much sooner than that. For example, if we think of one of the good Irish middle distance guys, maybe someone like Mark Hanrahan - if he were to run a full effort 5 mile race on Sunday, he'd be best just to do recovery runs until Saturday?

    I know that if Seamus Power raced at the weekend he wouldn't have a hard workout until the following Friday. Likewise Jerry Kiernan does the same with his athletes - no hard session until the following weekend.


  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭tergat


    cfitz wrote: »
    Tergat, would you apply that advice to your top athletes? I would have thought that high mileage athletes would be safe to do a hard workout much sooner than that. For example, if we think of one of the good Irish middle distance guys, maybe someone like Mark Hanrahan - if he were to run a full effort 5 mile race on Sunday, he'd be best just to do recovery runs until Saturday?

    cfitz,

    If my athletes run a 800m, 1500m, or 3000m on say a Saturday I will have them do a medium intensity workout on Tuesday e.g. LT Workout with 4-6*8-10 secs uphill sprints afterwards with full recovery, but very controlled workout. Then on the Friday I will have them do a harder workout when they are fully recovered.For a guy running a 5000m I will wait until Thur/Fri after a race Sat so they are fully recovered.

    A guy like Mark Hanrahan who runs 85-100 miles a week consistently has a huge aerobic base so can recover quicker than an athlete with a lesser base. He may be ready to do another workout maybe Wed/Thur depending on how he feels. But more often than not Irish athletes will hop on the track 2 days after a race and what happens? Injury or poor race performances.

    People underestimate the importance of recovery and have in their minds that if they dont 'kill' themselves in workouts they will not improve. Simply put, it makes no sense to hammer away at hard workouts for weeks and months on end because injury, illness, and mental burnout occur. However, one can train to a high level of running fitness without doing really hard workouts; and there is a low chance of bad things happening.

    Key factors people need to look at are as follows:

    1) Performance level. A fitter runner can absorb more fast running without breaking down.

    2) Training consistency. A runner who trains at a decent level for several weeks or months without having setbacks or time off due to injury or illness can handle more quality training per workout and per week.

    3) Technical skill. Someone who "pounds the ground," overstrides, leans too much or pronates too much is more likely to have problems when doing high volume quality training.

    4) Weekly aerobic volume. A runner who has been covering more miles per week, for several weeks, can handle more quality interval work than one who has been doing lower mileage over a shorter time-frame.

    5) Life stress. If you work a lot and have family obligations, you can't do as much quality interval training per workout or per week as someone who is "stress-free."

    You can only train as hard as you can recover!

    Tergat


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,236 ✭✭✭Abhainn


    I'd have to disagree here. It is probably possible to run both but to do yourself justice in both is near impossible IMO. If I were to do the 2, I would run my guts out in Dublin and jog/walk/enjoy NY, wouldn't even dream of chasing a time.

    Roadrunner maybe you misinterpreted me - sorry.
    I was not referring to PB in each, far from that. Its very possible to run and enjoy both. Run both at LSR pace or thereabouts and a great day out could be had.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,983 ✭✭✭TheRoadRunner


    Abhainn wrote: »
    Roadrunner maybe you misinterpreted me - sorry.
    I was not referring to PB in each, far from that. Its very possible to run and enjoy both. Run both at LSR pace or thereabouts and a great day out could be had.

    ooops actually misread your post


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,912 ✭✭✭thirtyfoot


    tergat wrote: »
    If my athletes run a 800m, 1500m, or 3000m on say a Saturday I will have them do a medium intensity workout on Tuesday e.g. LT Workout with 4-6*8-10 secs uphill sprints afterwards with full recovery, but very controlled workout. Then on the Friday I will have them do a harder workout when they are fully recovered.For a guy running a 5000m I will wait until Thur/Fri after a race Sat so they are fully recovered.

    How would you approach an athlete having to go through rounds? Maybe more relevant to elite elites who are at majors like worlds and euro but say a 1:53 800m man who would need to put a decent 800m on a saturday together to make a final on Sunday at the Nationals. With the competitive nature of 8's in Ireland he would have to treat saturday almost as a final yet be geared to be racing his best on the Sunday. Do you train to be able to handle this? Or if an athlete is going to have to potentially run 3 races in 4 days do you train to be able to handle this?


  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭tergat


    Tingle wrote: »
    How would you approach an athlete having to go through rounds? Maybe more relevant to elite elites who are at majors like worlds and euro but say a 1:53 800m man who would need to put a decent 800m on a saturday together to make a final on Sunday at the Nationals. With the competitive nature of 8's in Ireland he would have to treat saturday almost as a final yet be geared to be racing his best on the Sunday. Do you train to be able to handle this? Or if an athlete is going to have to potentially run 3 races in 4 days do you train to be able to handle this?

    Tingle,

    Interesting question, it is a hard one to call. I would not change anything, just make sure the athlete is fresh going into the competition and have a solid aerobic system in place. I think if you have a solid aerobic foundation then this will get you through rounds or consecutive races. I have never trained athletes for this as such, I have just made sure they have solid endurance.

    Those with weak endurance will suffer in rounds or racing on consecutive days. Another question to ponder is would it be worthwhile to do back to back workout days to teach your body to handle the stress? Kenyans do it but then again look at the huge aerobic base they have built up over the years. Can Irish athletes say the same? My guess is no they can't.

    A very important point when racing rounds or on consecutive days is to make sure you do the little recovery bits right such as:
    - Proper warm down & stretching
    - Maybe Massage if used to it
    - Some carbs & protein within 30 mins of finishing the race to speed up recovery process
    - Replace lost fluids
    - Get good meal within 2-3 hours of race
    - Get good nights sleep
    - Easy 10-20 min shake out run the following morning to open up capilliary beds etc.

    Hope that helps.

    Tergat


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,912 ✭✭✭thirtyfoot


    tergat wrote: »
    Hope that helps.

    Tergat

    Yeah, sounds good. I was toying with doing specific training to be able to do big back to back races but didn't know how but was wary anyway and have decided to back the training I have accumulated over the winter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭T runner


    tergat wrote: »
    Tingle,

    Interesting question, it is a hard one to call. I would not change anything, just make sure the athlete is fresh going into the competition and have a solid aerobic system in place. I think if you have a solid aerobic foundation then this will get you through rounds or consecutive races. I have never trained athletes for this as such, I have just made sure they have solid endurance.

    Those with weak endurance will suffer in rounds or racing on consecutive days. Another question to ponder is would it be worthwhile to do back to back workout days to teach your body to handle the stress? Kenyans do it but then again look at the huge aerobic base they have built up over the years. Can Irish athletes say the same? My guess is no they can't.

    A very important point when racing rounds or on consecutive days is to make sure you do the little recovery bits right such as:
    - Proper warm down & stretching
    - Maybe Massage if used to it
    - Some carbs & protein within 30 mins of finishing the race to speed up recovery process
    - Replace lost fluids
    - Get good meal within 2-3 hours of race
    - Get good nights sleep
    - Easy 10-20 min shake out run the following morning to open up capilliary beds etc.

    Hope that helps.

    Tergat

    Lydiard recognised the importance of endurance in his athletes for this specific reason. All his middle distance runners went through marathon conditioning as an early phase.

    Some of his athletes apparently beat faster athletes in the olympics because they were able to run faster than them in the final. He even had teammates make sure that heats were fast wherever possible so that endurance became more of a factor.

    Tergat, Is there ever a worry about losing leg speed during the recovery period with no hard sessions, or do your athletes do an easy session/strides during the recovery period?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,415 ✭✭✭Racing Flat


    Tingle wrote: »
    How would you approach an athlete having to go through rounds?

    I've often wondered about this.

    And would the Olympics/World Championships etc. be a better spectacle/yield better times if the races were run as straight finals, with the heats a few weeks previously...Seems a shame in a way that the fastest 800m runner doesn't necessarily win the Olympics, rather the one who can perform over 3 tough races in 5 days...


  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭tergat


    T runner wrote: »
    Lydiard recognised the importance of endurance in his athletes for this specific reason. All his middle distance runners went through marathon conditioning as an early phase.

    Some of his athletes apparently beat faster athletes in the olympics because they were able to run faster than them in the final. He even had teammates make sure that heats were fast wherever possible so that endurance became more of a factor.

    Tergat, Is there ever a worry about losing leg speed during the recovery period with no hard sessions, or do your athletes do an easy session/strides during the recovery period?

    T runner,

    Well said, I think Lydiard really was spot on with most of his stuff. What recovery period to you mean, after the season is over or week leading to key race?

    Tergat


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,617 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Very Interesting thread. I'm reading it from the POV of ultra distance, where I reckon the specifics don't apply (Run 150 miles in a race, rest for 1/3 of a year!), but the generalities definitely do. I'd be interested to hear how you think you could adapt the specifics for ultra running races.

    Couldn't agree more about the importance of recovery, and the negative effect of life-strees.

    My own experience would definitely suggest that having a very high milage background hugely improves recovery speed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,441 ✭✭✭Slogger Jogger


    On a related topic to Enduro's post, I've done many marathons over the years and I've never rested for 26 days after. Oddly, and counterintuitively, I've done some races within as little as 6 days of a marathon and done pretty well (for me), so the theory works differently for different people / different events perhaps?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,364 Mod ✭✭✭✭RacoonQueen


    Abhainn wrote: »
    No reason not to run both if you have prepared properly and not try and PB in each. If you run DM easy, NY can be achieved also. I think there are a number of contributors here who have ran marathons very close to each other

    You could prepare by doing back to back long runs (doubles) on a few occasions, these aren't easy. For my Conn Ultra preparation this year I built up to a 24 and 21 milers at the weekend.

    Personally I love DM and will want to run it every year when it comes around. To run well in NY is on my plans next year but I don't want to drop Dublin either!

    Yeah, I don't want to pass up my opportunity to run NY but I love Dublin and don't want to miss it, not this year anyway. I was thinking back to back long runs to prepare me for doing the two and maybe two tough LSRs 6/7 days apart.
    If I were to do the 2, I would run my guts out in Dublin and jog/walk/enjoy NY,

    Thats the order I was thinking of doing it in. Then again, there's risk of getting injured in Dublin then not being able to run NY. *sigh* Decisions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,365 ✭✭✭hunnymonster


    or could that be that you didn't race flat out in the marathons? We both had experience of running a race shortly after a marathon last week. My legs were completely fresh in Wicklow on Saturday with a marathon the previous Monday, but only because I ran the marathon at a low HR and very comfortable. Had I raced it, I'm sure I would have still felt it on Saturday for the 10km. That's my gut feeling but I don't know how to convert it to numbers (days, %efforts etc)


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,365 ✭✭✭hunnymonster


    last post was in reply to SJ.

    RQ, I would definitely race the first one and enjoy the second (or enjoy both). I did 3 in 3 weeks at some stage, each to the same perceived effort (hard but not gut shattering, 8/10) and the times slowed with each for the same effort. Ok, this was when I was a lot less experienced but still I would suggest the approach.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,031 ✭✭✭Stupid_Private


    On a related topic to Enduro's post, I've done many marathons over the years and I've never rested for 26 days after. Oddly, and counterintuitively, I've done some races within as little as 6 days of a marathon and done pretty well (for me), so the theory works differently for different people / different events perhaps?

    The values below from Tergat's earlier post would suggest why you can race a week after a marathon. If you went all out and could barely walk the day after because the muscles were so stiff then you'd be hard pushed to even think about racing that week. It's also not 26 days off, just 26 days before the next tough session
    Tergat wrote:
    5% below all-out effort = 3/4ths of normal recovery time;
    10% below all-out effort = 1/2 of normal recovery time;
    15% below all-out effort = 1/4th of normal recovery time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭tergat


    On a related topic to Enduro's post, I've done many marathons over the years and I've never rested for 26 days after. Oddly, and counterintuitively, I've done some races within as little as 6 days of a marathon and done pretty well (for me), so the theory works differently for different people / different events perhaps?

    Slogger Jogger,

    When I spoke about race recovery I meant not incorporating hard workouts/races within the time frame to allow for maximum recovery. Certain individuals may be able to handle harder stuff sooner but its better to be safe than sorry.

    Muscles, tendons and ligaments are not strong enough to take hard training in the immediate 3-4 weeks post-marathon. So, be careful, please!

    Tergat


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭T runner


    tergat wrote: »
    T runner,

    Well said, I think Lydiard really was spot on with most of his stuff. What recovery period to you mean, after the season is over or week leading to key race?

    Tergat

    Sorry, I mean during the recovery after a race:
    Raced 21k on saturday, tough hilly off and on road course.
    I agree about the gap to the next hard session. wont be doing a hard session again until probably next tuesday at the very earliest. In the meantime I presume doing a 6-8 strides after some easy runs is Ok and also now wondering (after reading the tempo thread) if Id get away with an easy tempo session (something like a short tempo run at long tempo pace followed by a few strides) this weekend?
    Thanks in advance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭tergat


    T runner wrote: »
    Sorry, I mean during the recovery after a race:
    Raced 21k on saturday, tough hilly off and on road course.
    I agree about the gap to the next hard session. wont be doing a hard session again until probably next tuesday at the very earliest. In the meantime I presume doing a 6-8 strides after some easy runs is Ok and also now wondering (after reading the tempo thread) if Id get away with an easy tempo session (something like a short tempo run at long tempo pace followed by a few strides) this weekend?
    Thanks in advance.

    T runner,

    There is no problem doing 6-8 strides after some easy days once you are not sprinting and taking to short a recovery. You do not want to build acidosis in the muscles.

    A favourite of mine is 4-6 short hill sprints (8-12 secs) with 2-3 mins walk recovery. These are becoming exceedingly popular for distance runners, thanks in large part to Renato Canova and later Brad Hudson. They are becoming popular because they work. It's funny how it almost seems like a trend or a fad to do hill sprints now. In reality distance runners, and even more so, sprinters have been doing short hill sprints for a long time, it's just never been popularized as a key to training. These can be done once a week after an easy run and the day before a workout. They are great for leg strength, form, a recruiting fast twitch fibres.

    If you feel recovered try a light tempo by all means, just listen to your body. If tired back off.

    Tergat


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,079 ✭✭✭BeepBeep67


    Hi Tergat - I've been training to run a cluster of races towards the end of the month - 4 in 2 wks between 3k and 6k
    • 21/06 - 5k (18:30ish)
    • 26/06 - 6k (22:30ish)
    • 01/07 - 3k (10:45ish)
    • 05/07 - 5k (18:30ish)
    They all have 4-5 days between them, what would your guidance be on activitiy in between races?
    Maybe race day +1 40mins @ 8:30; +2 same; +3 same w/6 x 100m strides; +4 20min @ 8:30 - or anything additional?

    BTW reading your threads over the last few days have been motivating and enlightening!


Advertisement