Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CaptainNegative
You'd have to be pretty thick not to be able to figure it out.
|
You'd think that, wouldn't you? Yet my brother, a partner in a law firm and only in his early 30s, nope, can't do it for the life of him.
My best friend: one of the most intelligent people I know. Again, can't get his head around the auld predictive texting.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SumGuy
it really doesn't matter.
|
It kinda does though. As Max_Damage says:
Quote:
I often wonder what the English language will be like in 50 years time, or even 20 years. Text speak is like Newspeak (from Nineteen Eighty-Four) in a different form.
*Doubleplusungood*
|
The point of Newspeak was to reduce the English vocabulary to the bare minimum, thus future generations would not have enough scope for committing thoughtcrime - there wouldn't be enough words for them to do so. God, yet another of Orwell's predictions coming true!
Language being f*cked around with - not good. I'm not saying text-speak is part of some conspiracy for world domination (although I might run that by tunaman!) but the eradication of words and phrases is quite a horrible thought.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by D.T. Jesus
If I was to try to use textspeak, it would take me longer to text/type because I'd be constantly thinking "How the hell can I make this word shorter".
|
Heh, me too. That's exactly the point Terry was making earlier about it being more difficult to type text-speak than proper English.
I wonder if other languages are being similarly raped?