Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

I know I exist. Do you?

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 27,939 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    whythetyre wrote: »
    I know I exist. Do you? The limitations to reality could be explained by the existence of at least one consciousness other than my own. Is it yours?

    'Do you' what? Is this 'do you exist' or 'do you know you exist' or 'do you know that I exist' or 'do you know whether I exist'.

    Second sentence: 'Is it the existence of your consciousness, in addition to mine, that explains the limitations to reality?' Limitations to reality in reference to whom? Have we established that reality has limitations?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 588 ✭✭✭MisterEpicurus


    whythetyre wrote: »
    The limitations to reality could be explained by the existence of at least one consciousness other than my own. Is it yours?

    What on Earth does this mean?

    I can see myself if I look into a mirror, indeed I can see other people as well. This is satisfactory to assume by own existence with our without other people. Arguing about 'at least one consciousness' is making a premise which will and never has been the case.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭roosh


    What on Earth does this mean?

    I can see myself if I look into a mirror, indeed I can see other people as well. This is satisfactory to assume by own existence with our without other people. Arguing about 'at least one consciousness' is making a premise which will and never has been the case.

    What you see is a body, but can you define where the body begins and ends?

    Presumably you take yourself to be the internal organs of the body, the bones, blood and everything else; presumably the oxygen in the blood is part of "you", the energy that "your" body derives from food, the vitamins you derive from the sun, etc, are all part of "you".

    At what point though, do "you" end and does the oxygen which you inhale begin; at what point in the digestive process does the food you get energy from stop being food and start being "you"; at what point does the sunlight which your body processes stop being sunlight and start being "you"?

    Is your vision a part of "you"; at what point does "your" vision end and what you see begin?


    There is no actual point at which "you" end and something else begins; the universe is just one single continuum of which "you" are a part; but there is no point of separation; for there to be separate entities it would necessitate empty space in the strictest sense of the term; because if there is no empty space then there is no separation of objects.

    Understanding this and relaising it are two different things; to be liberated entirely from attachment to the idea of a separate self is another thing entirely.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 588 ✭✭✭MisterEpicurus


    roosh wrote: »
    What you see is a body, but can you define where the body begins and ends?

    Presumably you take yourself to be the internal organs of the body, the bones, blood and everything else; presumably the oxygen in the blood is part of "you", the energy that "your" body derives from food, the vitamins you derive from the sun, etc, are all part of "you".

    At what point though, do "you" end and does the oxygen which you inhale begin; at what point in the digestive process does the food you get energy from stop being food and start being "you"; at what point does the sunlight which your body processes stop being sunlight and start being "you"?

    Is your vision a part of "you"; at what point does "your" vision end and what you see begin?


    There is no actual point at which "you" end and something else begins; the universe is just one single continuum of which "you" are a part; but there is no point of separation; for there to be separate entities it would necessitate empty space in the strictest sense of the term; because if there is no empty space then there is no separation of objects.

    Understanding this and relaising it are two different things; to be liberated entirely from attachment to the idea of a separate self is another thing entirely.

    Thanks for the mysterious post.

    I don't think anyone can ever come to a satisfactory or agreeable answer on what 'you' or 'me' is defined as. So, the answer is ultimately subjective opinion. However, when referring to 'I', I'm referring to my own set of reflections originating from the mass neural network inside my body. I can do without a kidney, I can do without my spleen, I can't do without my consciousness. So as far as I'd use it, it would be in the conscious sense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭roosh


    Thanks for the mysterious post.

    I don't think anyone can ever come to a satisfactory or agreeable answer on what 'you' or 'me' is defined as. So, the answer is ultimately subjective opinion. However, when referring to 'I', I'm referring to my own set of reflections originating from the mass neural network inside my body. I can do without a kidney, I can do without my spleen, I can't do without my consciousness. So as far as I'd use it, it would be in the conscious sense.

    "You" or "me" is just a concept, it is a belief to which there is attachment; it is the belief that there is a separate self which exists apart from everything else; but if we question that idea, we can see that it falls down.

    "Your" conscious experience is largely dependent on "external" stimuli; so, again, the question can be posed; at which point do these "external" stimuli stop being "external" and start being "you"; at what point does "your" consciousness stop being just a part of the continuum of the universe and start being "you"?

    There is no actual point.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 Unoriginal Choice3


    cogito ergo sum :P


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,212 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    cogito ergo sum :P
    MOD NOTE:
    Given that this is the Philosophy forum, you are encouraged to elaborate upon this statement by René Descartes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭roosh


    Black Swan wrote: »
    cogito ergo sum :P
    MOD NOTE:
    Given that this is the Philosophy forum, you are encouraged to elaborate upon this statement by René Descartes.
    the fundamental question which arises from this is, what precisely is meant by "I"; what is that exists and what is it that does the thinking?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement