Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Occupy Galway, fresh start thread

  • 02-05-2012 9:07am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 81,223 ✭✭✭✭biko


    The last thread on this topic lasted 5 months before it got too much but let's try again.
    Feel free to view your opinions on the Galway movement or the movement in general and what they seek to achieve.
    The only two caveats are, don't be a dick (to them or to other posters that disagree with you) and back up with proper sources any statements you make.

    Last news I've seen
    Occupy Galway not breaking the law, says Garda
    GARDAÍ HAVE said they have no legal basis to take action against Occupy Galway, which is now the last remaining anti-globalisation camp on the island.
    Former mayor and Fine Gael councillor Pádraig Conneely has said he will not attend the St Patrick’s Day parade viewing stand in the square in protest at the failure of the authorities to take action.
    “I will attend the parade as a member of the public, but I will not sit on a viewing stand overlooking what I believe is a shanty town,” Mr Conneely said.

    My own opinion: even though I don't think they'll ever achieve what they set out to do (which I think is generally bring on some 1917 style revolution) I think it's good they are highlighting injustices and they show how the people, if pushed too far, will protest peacefully.

    Of course politicians will want them gone, they want status quo back with the masses shutting up and paying the taxes (their inflated salaries/pensions).
    Occupy are actually "walking the walk" and fair play to them for that.


«13456711

Comments

  • Posts: 5,121 Kara Ugly Beer


    Their website seems to have grown quite a bit
    http://www.occupygalway.org/

    Their current headlines are calling for a no vote in the Stability Treaty referendum and they seem to be aligning themselves with the voteno.ie website which is edited by members of the Socialist Workers Party.

    To me it looks like the movement has been hijacked by the SWP and is being used as a permanent political base.

    While I believe anyone should be able to set out their stall or stand up on a soap box I don't believe this should extend to a permanent camp being allowed to remain.

    On the movement in general I was amazed when the Occupy Dublin members went to help the landlord of some 20 to 30 properties who was being evicted from his mansion in a gated community in Killiney recently - I'm not sure what they hoped to achieve by supporting a couple who most definitely are the 1%


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭Red_Wake


    biko wrote: »
    Of course politicians will want them gone, they want status quo back with the masses shutting up and paying the taxes (their inflated salaries/pensions).
    Occupy are actually "walking the walk" and fair play to them for that.

    In what sense do you believe they've changed the status quo.

    And is there anywhere I can find a comprehensive guide to their goals and beliefs?




  • meh, still have no time for these folks. They should be moved on. Let them protest all they want, no problem with that, just let them rent out a premises like everyone else. They are nothing special, just an eyesore that has gone beyond a joke at this stage


  • Registered Users Posts: 210 ✭✭eamo12


    Remember, this is the city that wants to erect a statue to the murderous thug Guevara. They have neither the balls or the courage to move these beardos on. It's about state/taxpayer handouts - that's all they care about.

    Mod note, banned


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,353 ✭✭✭squonk


    I see it as the authorities not having the stones to move them on at this point. I have no issue with anyone whatsoever voicing their opinions and protesting and occupying an area or building to make a point. The problem here is that the protestors aren't campaigning for any one cause. It's a disparate group of people protesting at various different things. To me this looks like a long, drawn out speech. If you can't make your point in 30 seconds then it's probably not worth making. Same with these guys. If they couldn't make their point in the first 3 weeks of occupation, what's a year going to do for them? When exactly do they go?

    If the gardai have no legal basis to remove them, what's to stop homeless individuals pitching tents elsewhere in the square? That certainly wouldn't be tolerated. I don't see why this prolonged occupation is either.

    At this point, the best things these guys could do is pack up and move on. The debate has moved on. The occupy movement in general is something now referred to in common everyday speech as past tense. Why there should still be one camping out in Eyre Square is strange and somehow stupid looking.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,913 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    Find it odd that they have been moved on in Waterford, Dublin and Cork but not here. They arent achieving anything like what they wanted to. They dont have '99%' of peoples support so really they should just pack up from the Square and as said above rent a premises if they need so much space. Also find it strange that they dont seem to ever be open in the Square before at least 9:30 in the morning, i mean if they want working peoples support then i dont think that appearing to have a lie in every day would help with that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,353 ✭✭✭squonk


    Also find it strange that they dont seem to ever be open in the Square before at least 9:30 in the morning, i mean if they want working peoples support then i dont think that appearing to have a lie in every day would help with that.

    I'd say the amount that actually live there vs. those who spend the night at home is the reason for the late opening!


  • Registered Users Posts: 509 ✭✭✭Paddyfield


    One of the City Councilors (Crowe or Connely?) said that if a caravan parked in Eyre Square, then it would be removed and there would be legal proceedings.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Councillors Conneely and Crowe are a pair of eyesores and earsores. They should be removed immediately and skipped. To think that these people will be given official roles during the Volvo race <shudders> :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭elvis99


    I think their actions are admirable. Whether you agree or disagree with them they've showed great balls. They've stood up for what they believe and they deserve respect for that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,353 ✭✭✭squonk


    What have they stood up for though? They erected a camp in Eyre Square and nobody has asked them to move. That's hardly standing up for something really. The people of Derry or Syria or the American Civil Rights movement can all be admired for standing up for something and what they did took balls but skulking in a tent in the corner of Eyre Square for six months isn't what could be called standing up for anything.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,913 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    squonk wrote: »
    I'd say the amount that actually live there vs. those who spend the night at home is the reason for the late opening!
    Very true, this would also call into question the need for the tent city part of it i guess.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,550 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    You have to admire their perseverance but question their judgement.

    At various times, they've been promoting the Freeman-on-the-Land hokum, decrying water fluoridation the most monstrously conceived and dangerous Communist plot we have ever had to face, promoting a Goth night in De Burgos and wanting cheaper fossil fuels for all (but also costing up a, er fusion reactor "to harness solar")

    Today's offering on Facebook was this.
    You can check if you are registered for the upcoming Fiscal Treaty Referendum with this resource.

    The EU Bureaucrats want to sent up an inter-governmental organization (a big bank) that is:

    1) Above Law - the ESM (European Stability Mechanism) will "enjoy immunity from every form of judicial process" Article 27.2
    2) Above Democracy - the unelected administrators of the "ESM will be... immune from...executive, judicial, administrative or legislative action" Article 27.3
    3) Above Finance - We are required to "irrevocably and unconditionally undertake to pay any capital call made" within seven days if is such requests. Article 9.3

    Their solution to a banking collapse is to create a massive bank with unlimited power that will last forever.

    “We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” -Albert Einstein

    This legislation is highly dangerous to the existence of the above principles. If you want Law, Democracy and Finance to remain open then this treaty needs to be closed.

    The numbers against this treaty are growing in Ireland and Europe but the decision is in our hands. Get registered, get informed and get out on May 31st.
    Now the problem here is that in the text of the Treaty that exists on Occupygalway.org, there's no Article 27. There's also no Article 9.3. No sign in the official version either so you have to wonder about a group who will tell you from one side of their mouth that you're being led up the garden path with the Treaty and just randomly making **** up about it with the other.


  • Registered Users Posts: 120 ✭✭factual lies


    If people are putting up tents and not sleeping in them, is that no littering? Any tent not in use should be immediately removed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭elvis99


    squonk wrote: »
    What have they stood up for though? They erected a camp in Eyre Square and nobody has asked them to move. That's hardly standing up for something really. The people of Derry or Syria or the American Civil Rights movement can all be admired for standing up for something and what they did took balls but skulking in a tent in the corner of Eyre Square for six months isn't what could be called standing up for anything.

    They have views which are bizarre, but some views they express I would agree with. My point was they stood up for what they believed in, and still haven't backed down, that's admirable imo.

    And Id happily prefer to support a tent full of crazy people in Eyre square for 6 months before a tent full of cronies at the Galway races for 3 days.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    They have it in their minutes that the ODS breached section 21 of the Public Order act - hence the dismantling of the camp for the St Patricks Day parade.

    VOR - please say you want Eyre Square for something.


  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭elvis99


    Robbo wrote: »
    You have to admire their perseverance but question their judgement.

    At various times, they've been promoting the Freeman-on-the-Land hokum, decrying water fluoridation the most monstrously conceived and dangerous Communist plot we have ever had to face, promoting a Goth night in De Burgos and wanting cheaper fossil fuels for all (but also costing up a, er fusion reactor "to harness solar")

    Today's offering on Facebook was this.

    Now the problem here is that in the text of the Treaty that exists on Occupygalway.org, there's no Article 27. There's also no Article 9.3. No sign in the official version either so you have to wonder about a group who will tell you from one side of their mouth that you're being led up the garden path with the Treaty and just randomly making **** up about it with the other.

    http://www.european-council.europa.eu/media/582311/05-tesm2.en12.pdf

    Those sections are actually listed as part of the treaty according to the PDF which I found on the european council website, make of it what you will, but it is covered in Article 32, the sections they have highlighted seem mixed up.

    Im not a supporter of occupy but the section they have highlighted may not have been pulled from there hoop.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,968 ✭✭✭jkforde


    biko wrote: »
    The only two caveats are, don't be a dick...
    eamo12 wrote: »
    Remember, this is the city that wants to erect a statue to the murderous thug Guevara. They have neither the balls or the courage to move these beardos on. It's about state/taxpayer handouts - that's all they care about.

    great start there eamo12 :rolleyes:

    my opinion is that these folks are genuine if idealistic in their concerns about social injustice, which is insidious & obvious to anyone who makes the effort to ask the right questions. it's too easy & intellectually lazy to negatively label people without at least trying to empathise with their concerns and situation. they're not beardos, they're brave citizens who are voicing concerns that the rest of us cowards won't voice, maybe because we're too busy being brainwashed consumers. i mean, how many people on here have actually bothered to talk with them in their camp?

    🌦️ 6.7kwp, 45°, SSW, mid-Galway 🌦️ | Smart Day/Night



  • Registered Users Posts: 81,223 ✭✭✭✭biko


    eamo12 banned.
    As in the previous thread there will be some pretty heavy modding going on so do try hard to be civil. I don't mind banning people from each "camp".


  • Registered Users Posts: 532 ✭✭✭Gingko


    I agree with Biko's opening post. People should always have the right to protest especially these days after all that has and is happening. I personally don't think the Galway protest is "in your face" at all? It's nestled into a small corner and not blocking the entrance to Eyre square. They have it fenced off and they seem to be concious of litter etc. When I visited last everyone was very polite and courteous and easy to warm to.

    I do hope that it doesn't go the way of the Dublin protest that started well but ended up dirty, littered and to be quite honest there were quite a few scumbags that latched on there in the end.

    What would it say about the Irish if there was no protest at all? Wish them well!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,052 ✭✭✭WallyGUFC


    Gingko wrote: »
    I agree with Biko's opening post. People should always have the right to protest especially these days after all that has and is happening. I personally don't think the Galway protest is "in your face" at all? It's nestled into a small corner and not blocking the entrance to Eyre square. They have it fenced off and they seem to be concious of litter etc. When I visited last everyone was very polite and courteous and easy to warm to.

    I do hope that it doesn't go the way of the Dublin protest that started well but ended up dirty, littered and to be quite honest there were quite a few scumbags that latched on there in the end.

    What would it say about the Irish if there was no protest at all? Wish them well!
    But it's not a protest to the normal passerby. I don't see protesting going on. Whenever I pass, 3/4 times a week, I see a few lads in the main marquee sitting around drinking tea. That's it. What are they protesting against again? Why are they allowed stay there? Would caravans be as welcome in Eyre Square? Can anyone just decide to camp there now? Why do they claim to represent the 99%? All interesting questions...


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,155 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    In the time the Occupy camp has been in Eyre Square I've been offered 5 jobs and my girlfriend has got 4 part time jobs...but I guess sitting in a tent in the middle of the town is another way to deal with the recession..the 99.9999999999999999...whatever % that each person there would protest for and against won't buy my lunch, pay for my internet or put petrol in my car. Self preservation and all that, if you have the months to piss away sitting in a tent, how bad off are you? Maybe it's a sign that social welfare is too generous in Ireland more than anything. Or are these people unwilling to work and see this as a cause which justifies them not looking for work?

    I really don't get it at this stage. It's past the point of protest. Does anybody have any positive thoughts when they see the camp now? For the first few days I thought it was admirable, I really did. It quickly spiralled into a cluster f**k and now it's nothing more than settlement of tents in the Square..there is no protest.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,785 ✭✭✭CrowdedHouse


    I'm wondering why the thread was re-opened at all.

    Seems a bit pointless like the 'protest'

    Seven Worlds will Collide



  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭elvis99


    Why such opposition to Occupy? But when it comes to those who lead us they still get away with murder, its like we complain about those who seek change.

    And i'm not referring to Fianna fail or Fine Gael uniquely i'm talking about all our political leaders. Our health minister purchases €300 coffee machines with taxpayers money, Sinn fein claiming expenses for enough ink cartridges to print 3.2million sheets of A4 paper, they are robbing taxpayers blind but yet we give out about those on social welfare being scabs.

    And thats what they want the middle class giving out about the lower classes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    elvis99 wrote: »
    Why such opposition to Occupy? But when it comes to those who lead us they still get away with murder, its like we complain about those who seek change.

    And i'm not referring to Fianna fail or Fine Gael uniquely i'm talking about all our political leaders. Our health minister purchases €300 coffee machines with taxpayers money, Sinn fein claiming expenses for enough ink cartridges to print 3.2million sheets of A4 paper, they are robbing taxpayers blind but yet we give out about those on social welfare being scabs.

    And thats what they want the middle class giving out about the lower classes.

    In my experience they don't want people thinking about the situation, just doing what they want you to do. Try to talk to them having actual figures and sources and they just get sullen or argumentative - because you aren't buying their line - and god help you if you have an opinion on anything that doesn't match theirs.

    A lot of the things they promote are of dubious legality (the freeman rubbish) or morality (refusing to pay your own legally accrued debts, the jailing of people who haven't been found guilty breaking laws & trial by media).

    From a practical side some of the things they have suggested - unilateral wage cuts for people they don't like. Allowing wage contracts to be broken for anyone creates a precedent that puts everyones wage contract in jeopardy - which i.m.o. is the real reason why CPA is so contentious for the likes of siptu who have public & private sector members.

    They come out with facts (e.g. shell to sea) that are misunderstood/ misleading at best and just plain wrong at worst. Then claim that they didn't bring it up at all.

    Their responses to inquiries about transparency of their "organisation" e.g. funding membership etc, are hypocritical at best - if they want to decry organizations such as banks or political parties for being not transparent enough they have to lead by example.

    All in all they come across as a a parent telling a child "Do what I say not want I do" or when asked why you should/shouldn't do something "Because I said so" (god help all parents when kids figure out that one means they don't have a good reason).

    Thanks we have enough legitimate political parties that aren't camping in an area not designated for camping (that has to be illegal) already doing the same.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭dloob


    elvis99 wrote: »
    http://www.european-council.europa.eu/media/582311/05-tesm2.en12.pdf

    Those sections are actually listed as part of the treaty according to the PDF which I found on the european council website, make of it what you will, but it is covered in Article 32, the sections they have highlighted seem mixed up.

    Im not a supporter of occupy but the section they have highlighted may not have been pulled from there hoop.

    Yeah those articles are from the ESM treaty.
    The one being voted on is the treaty on stability, coordination and governance.

    The articles from the ESM treaty make better quotes though.

    This is one being voted on http://www.european-council.europa.eu/media/639235/st00tscg26_en12.pdf


  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭elvis99


    antoobrien wrote: »
    In my experience they don't want people thinking about the situation, just doing what they want you to do. Try to talk to them having actual figures and sources and they just get sullen or argumentative - because you aren't buying their line - and god help you if you have an opinion on anything that doesn't match theirs.

    A lot of the things they promote are of dubious legality (the freeman rubbish) or morality (refusing to pay your own legally accrued debts, the jailing of people who haven't been found guilty breaking laws & trial by media).

    From a practical side some of the things they have suggested - unilateral wage cuts for people they don't like. Allowing wage contracts to be broken for anyone creates a precedent that puts everyones wage contract in jeopardy - which i.m.o. is the real reason why CPA is so contentious for the likes of siptu who have public & private sector members.

    They come out with facts (e.g. shell to sea) that are misunderstood/ misleading at best and just plain wrong at worst. Then claim that they didn't bring it up at all.

    Their responses to inquiries about transparency of their "organisation" e.g. funding membership etc, are hypocritical at best - if they want to decry organizations such as banks or political parties for being not transparent enough they have to lead by example.

    All in all they come across as a a parent telling a child "Do what I say not want I do" or when asked why you should/shouldn't do something "Because I said so" (god help all parents when kids figure out that one means they don't have a good reason).

    Thanks we have enough legitimate political parties that aren't camping in an area not designated for camping (that has to be illegal) already doing the same.

    I agree with you on a number of points the morality aspect especially, people of course should pay there debts. I can't comment on things like the Croke park agreement and unions because I have a limited knowledge of employment law.

    I just felt there is a very negative view of those who want change. Especially when you see the behaviour of legitimate political parties, are they acting morally? are they leading by example? In my opinion no.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭fishy fishy


    antoobrien wrote: »
    They have it in their minutes that the ODS breached section 21 of the Public Order act - hence the dismantling of the camp for the St Patricks Day parade.

    VOR - please say you want Eyre Square for something.

    why? Its nice to see somebody standing up for their principals and sticking with it. Long may it live - hopefully protests like these will become more popular in the future - the way the people are being treated. Of course you will get the ones calling for them to be beheaded, but will have no problem benefitting from any gains the protesters achieve. You wont' see them handing it back. People NEED to protest - the sooner people realise this the better. We've been led around by the nose a bit too much to be honest.
    Long live the protest.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,913 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    why? Its nice to see somebody standing up for their principals and sticking with it. Long may it live - hopefully protests like these will become more popular in the future - the way the people are being treated. Of course you will get the ones calling for them to be beheaded, but will have no problem benefitting from any gains the protesters achieve. You wont' see them handing it back. People NEED to protest - the sooner people realise this the better. We've been led around by the nose a bit too much to be honest.
    Long live the protest.
    What have they achieved?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭fishy fishy


    What have they achieved?

    for starters, they get people thinking? Thinking is the first step. And it's no harm for everyone to start thinking about how screwed the people of this country are being, day in and day out. The more people start thinking the more of a chance that the people will make a difference.

    i know some people would wish them to go away, but I'd rather have them there as a constant reminder, rather than for them to be brushed under the carpet and pretend we are not being screwed (just what our dear leaders would love).

    Remember anemic eamon gilmore, (the most unconvincing speaker I think I've ever encountered) was no stranger to protesting himself - that was before the power hit him.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement