Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Downdraught prevention chimney cowls

  • 10-09-2006 2:09pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 277 ✭✭


    I was wondering about these. Pros/cons.
    I see there are rotating and stationary versions... the purpose, I assume
    being to prevent a downdraught from causing a smoke down situation
    at the fireplace.

    I've seen the rotating ones occasionally.

    Someone mentioned them to me but didn't know much about current
    thinking on them. Up until know I assumed I'd just put one of those
    standard cast iron cowls which keep crows out,etc.

    eg:
    http://www.hotline-chimneys.co.uk/cowls_main.htm


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭rooferPete


    Hi,

    If you have a down draught problem there are a lot of different cowls on the market, each one has purpose so it's best if you know the cause before spending on a cowl.

    One of the oldest and in my opinion still the best multi purose cowls is the "H" cowl, maybe not the prettiest but they have always worked for me.

    .


  • Registered Users Posts: 277 ✭✭iplogger1


    Thanks for the advice Pete.

    We haven't moved into the property yet. In fact they are just plastering
    the chimney this week ahead of slating the roof. The topic only came
    up when I told my father in-law that I purchased a nice pair of
    chimney pots. He asked if I was thinking about putting in a cowl to
    avoid "smoked downs". I hadn't even thought about anything other
    than the standard inverted cast iron cone shaped cowls.
    I guess it is premature for me to be worrying about downdraught
    cowls until we've actually lit a few fires and established if there is
    a downdraught problem or not.

    thx again
    ~ipl


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 53 ✭✭padraic mchale


    rooferPete wrote:
    Hi,

    If you have a down draught problem there are a lot of different cowls on the market, each one has purpose so it's best if you know the cause before spending on a cowl.

    One of the oldest and in my opinion still the best multi purose cowls is the "H" cowl, maybe not the prettiest but they have always worked for me.

    .

    Hi Rooferpete

    i have a down draught problem and i had a guy look at it. He also recommended the H Cowl but they seem to be very expensive €290 euro each plus 100 euro installation cost. This is for a terracota cowl. Do you know of anywhere cheaper?

    thanks,
    Padraic


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 1,919 Mod ✭✭✭✭karltimber


    rooferPete wrote:
    Hi,

    tne of the oldest and in my opinion still the best multi purose cowls is the "H" cowl, maybe not the prettiest but they have always worked for me.

    .


    does anyone have a picture of this type of cowl.

    K


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 204 ✭✭serotonin_sam


    karltimber wrote:
    does anyone have a picture of this type of cowl.

    K
    H Cowl

    I never use my fireplace and have a chimney balloon placed above the fireplace opening. However, when there are strong winds, I still get the impression that its causing a draft. As well as down-draughting, do cowls play a role in reducing draughts? If so, which one should I get bearing in mind I have no intention whatsoever of using the fireplace over the short/medium term.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 53 ✭✭padraic mchale


    ttt


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    I've seen a cowl that has a chain that drops down the chimney so it can be opened and closed depending on whether or not you want to light a fire. I use my fireplace regularly so don't want it to be blocked in any permanent fashion. I'm thinking of getting the chain type. I tried to find the link (without success) to a supplier in Ireland that I've seen before - if I find it I'll post it.

    At the moment, when I suffer from downdraught in the chimney I simply light a a sheet of newspaper, and shove the lighted end up the chimney as far as I can. (don't let go of the paper!!) - this heats the chimney and reverses the draught's direction to an updraught. Its a temporary solution but it works.

    EDIT: Found link > here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 eddie4


    as has already been said there are a number of causes of down draught, and many differant cowls, as a chimney sweep i agree that the h pot is an excellent soloution but does present problems when it comes to cleaning and also preventing qour feathered friends from gaining access to the chimney. If the problem is not excessive then a standard static anti downdraught cowl is fine, supplied and fitted 90 euro if a spinning cowl is required the cost should be no more than 150 both are available from heiton buckley.


  • Registered Users Posts: 673 ✭✭✭mrtom


    Eddie4, I need to sort out my downdraught problem caused by a higher neighbours roof. Only happens when the wind is blowing a certain direction.
    I like the prices you mentioned for supply & fit. Can you advise me on who I can contact to do the job. I live in the Dunlaoghaire area.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭aujopimur


    Wait until you have your fire lighting in all weather conditions before you decide on a cowl.
    Most fluing problems are caused by poor constuction or flue location.
    With regard to draughts from fireplaces most people are under the impression that air is coming down the chimney when in fact its the opposit .


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 eddie4


    hi mrtom we cover your area, not sure on the ethics of posting contact details on here but if you would like to contact me my number is 085 1665807.


  • Registered Users Posts: 673 ✭✭✭mrtom


    Thanks, will be in touch.


  • Registered Users Posts: 189 ✭✭sooty_soupy


    Just be very careful guys that it is actually a blowdown problem. For over 20 years I have been a registered chimney technician in the North and have trained many people over the years. I am Chairman of the Northern Ireland Association of Chimney Sweeps and am a technical advisor to Building Control here in the north.

    Blowdown is often a term used freely when smoke is spilling back into the room. This can be caused by a number of issues. I agree that higher properties, trees or hills can pose a serious problem, but would also suggest that some cowls are significantly better than others. Blowdowns often are when the wind is coming from the direction of higher obstrctions placing the termination point in the pressure zone of the roof. This can be helped by putting a permanent vent on the wall to equlaise the pressures.

    Smoke could also be coming back into the room by something as simple as an extractor fan in the property creating a negative pressure in the home, or air tight construction leading to air starvation, effectively smothering the draught required to vent the flue gasses correctly. Finally it could be a ratio problem, where the fireplace is too large in dimension for the diameter of flue. If it of any use to you, the solution to ALL of the problems above is to fit an electric fan, if your finances allow, otherwise expect a lot of headaches and expense trying to cure it with cowls. The art of chimney building has unfortunatly been lost through the years.

    Hope this helps.

    David


  • Registered Users Posts: 24 DougB


    H Cowl

    I never use my fireplace and have a chimney balloon placed above the fireplace opening. However, when there are strong winds, I still get the impression that its causing a draft. As well as down-draughting, do cowls play a role in reducing draughts? If so, which one should I get bearing in mind I have no intention whatsoever of using the fireplace over the short/medium term.

    I always thought that if you stop up the flue that you lose ventilation for the house, especially if its an older house with now window vents etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Eurorunner


    DougB wrote: »
    I always thought that if you stop up the flue that you lose ventilation for the house, especially if its an older house with now window vents etc.
    The chimney ballloon is designed to allow some ventilation of the chimney. The purpose of this ventilation is solely to make sure that there are no damp issues with the chimney itself. Ventilation of the house itself should be achieved by other means. If its an older house, chances are that its not airtight anyways. Most ventilation issues have arisen as house builds have improved - and become more airtight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 164 ✭✭nick 56


    As a retired heating fitter I would agree with sooty soupy (above ) and suggest that if you have a problem you contact a real Qualified sweep for advice. As gas fitters will tell you the issue of extractor fans and sealed draft proofed houses can indeed create problems (boiler flues and gas fires).
    Another issue is the strain that the fitted device puts on the chimney and the pot especially in this age of high winds.
    When I worked in Dublin’s inner city fitting back boilers the locals told me that how you set a fire and the dampness of the fuel (coal / anthracite) was a big factor.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 Bumbleybeebee


    To all who have chimney problems. I supply the best thing to stop these problems.
    Its been mentioned before and its called a Chimney Closure.
    It works for many different problems
    : stops moisture coming down
    : regulates the up-draught so therefor regulates how much fuel you burn in your open fire
    : stops heat escaping up your chimney while the fire is not on simply by pulling the chain and the closing the cap at the top

    And the best advantage is that it saves heating costs by up to 66%, in this financial environment we are all trying to do that...it is not expensive and is a good investment that you could get back over 1-2 years after fitting.
    Its fitted and working in 45-60 mins depending on the roof, simple to use and comes with a guarantee.
    This is not an advertisement. I genuinely believe this is the only solution you need and it is tried and tested with amazing results. I am not aware of anyone who has not been happy with the Chimney Closure and most of my customers are so delighted with it they have passed on other people who are interested.
    If you need any more information just give me an IM and I can go over the details with you.
    Good Luck


  • Registered Users Posts: 80 ✭✭hillviewfarm


    I have a solid fuel stove installed. There is no chimney just some insulated double wall stainless steel liner. Anyway this liner exits the house and ends just below the roof. We live in a very windy place. There is a down draught a lot of the time. We do not have a vent installed.
    Any ideas what we can do? Extending the flue is an option but feel that the wind may blow same down.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 Bumbleybeebee


    I have a solid fuel stove installed. There is no chimney just some insulated double wall stainless steel liner.

    The units I install are only for chimneys as they need a Flu to sit into but you have other simple options that would be suitable for a stove chimney.
    A spinning cowl could be one of them as they move with the direction of the wind. They can be purchased in a DIY store the problem is you have to either fit them yourself or hire someone with the correct equipment to fit it for you.
    Do not attempt to get on the roof if you have not already got experience with working on roofs.

    Hope this helps
    BB


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,045 ✭✭✭ttm


    Appologies for my dumb post here earlier (now deleted) excuse is I had two reply windows open and picked the wrong one.

    In reply to hillviewfarm the top of chimney must be higher than the ridge of the roof (add on about 3 feet but less will do) othewise wind blowing over the roof will blow straight down the chimney. Top the lot with an H Cowl. If the top of the chimney is well away from the centre of the ridge then you can get away with a chimney that is not as high as the ridge even so the more height the better provided you can support it on your outside wall.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 80 ✭✭hillviewfarm


    Thanks for the advice. Is it possible to have more than 2 s bends in the piping ? To extend the twin wall and get the stove working I need to manipulate it with more bends (there are 2 already in use), and add more to have it reach the roof. It is the roof of the sunroom so its not as high as the roof of the house proper. Also what could I use to secure same. I am slow to secure the pipe into the rafters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,045 ✭✭✭ttm


    No bends are good ;) but I get away with 2 right angles and a 3 foot horizontal section. The draw is still OK but I also put in T sections at the joints so I can easliy sweep the whole thing. If I had to put in another 30 - 45 degree section it wouldn't bother me to much just make sure it doesn't stop you sweeping the chimney properly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 648 ✭✭✭PeteHeat


    I have a solid fuel stove installed. There is no chimney just some insulated double wall stainless steel liner. Anyway this liner exits the house and ends just below the roof. We live in a very windy place. There is a down draught a lot of the time. We do not have a vent installed.
    Any ideas what we can do? Extending the flue is an option but feel that the wind may blow same down.

    Hi,

    I strongly recommend that you stop trying to use the stove in its present set up, reading the above you run a serious risk of setting your house on fire.

    Be thankful that you have what appears to be a down draught problem because the flue gasses (smoke) is exiting just below your soffit / facia, if the flue gasses get hot enough everything above the flue could catch fire.

    The above is not taking smoke damage to the wall and possibly through vents into the house.

    I recommend that you try to employ someone who understands chimneys, flues and stoves, how they work and why there are minimum standards in place.

    .


  • Registered Users Posts: 189 ✭✭sooty_soupy


    Have any of you guys ever heard of the silent killer?

    ttm, I don't mean to be rude sir, but I would delete the post you have on this page as well as the other dumb one you claim to have left. ARE YOU SERIOUSLY ADVISING TWO RIGHT ANGLE BENDS AND A HORIZONTAL RUN. Do you have any idea how dangerous this is when the horizontal begins to clog up and the flue diameter is reduced. I can see where you are coming from using the "t" sections but they are normally used to create a sump below a vertical run in a flue and double up to be being an acceptable sweeping point, but what happens if the rogue retailer doesn't supply the "t" to the unsuspecting public, and uses a 90 degree bend instead....and poor joe bloggs remembers you saying you are using a 3ft Horizontal run in a flue system.

    FLUE GASES RISE. Vertical chimneys around Mainland Europe, America and Canada are built for a reason....they know how a chimney works. Your Document J will tell you a flue should have no bends in, but if there are bends to be used they should be no greater than 37.5 degrees

    IT'S HERE IN BLACK AND WHITE

    2.5 Direction - Flues should be vertical
    wherever possible and where a bend is necessary, it
    should not make an angle of more than 37.5° with
    the vertical. Horizontal flue runs should be avoided
    except in the case of a back outlet appliance, when
    the length of the horizontal section should not
    exceed 150 mm.


    and here

    Note:
    Should an offset be necessary in a metal or similar flue of minimum
    dimensions serving a closed appliance, then the flue size should be
    increased by 25 mm on each dimension (diameter or each side of
    square flue).


    Why is that someone from the North is needed and is being bombarded with questions from the Republic, with dozens of people coming up to the showroom to show me catalogues of cock up installations. JUST FOLLOW YOUR BUILDING REGULATIONS. If you want a stove...fine we'll sell you it..but seriously folks someone is going to loose a life if you don't get a grip. Do you want to know what concerns me...it will have to be the life of a child before someone sits up and takes notice. If an old wrinkly dies in some quiet village and Carbon Monoxide is found to be the cause...it will be a tragic accident and a box will be used to get rid of the remains and nothing will be done about it....if it is a child, the media will crawl all over it....remember the two kids in Corfu and the gas boiler....

    WHY WAIT FOR SOMEONE'S CHILD TO DIE...DO THE BLOODY THING PROPERLY OR DON'T DO IT AT ALL.


  • Registered Users Posts: 189 ✭✭sooty_soupy


    Hillview Farm.

    Here is a paragraph from Document J covering England Scotland and Wales, and has been adopted by Irish government.

    Provisions should be made to enable
    flues to be swept and inspected. A way of
    making reasonable provision would be to limit
    the number of changes of direction between
    the combustion appliance outlet and the flue
    outlet to not more than four 45° bends with not
    more than two of these being between an
    intended point of access for sweeping and
    either another point of access for sweeping or
    the flue outlet. (90° factory made bends,
    elbows or Tee pieces in fluepipes may be
    treated as being equal to two 45° bends

    I would also query just what is supporting your flue if you have not used ceiling supports and roof supports while ensuring you have you minimum clearances from combustibles as you pass through the roof. If this is installed wrongly, and not compliant with fire regulations and manufacturers instructions, you will find your insurance company will walk away from you when you burn the house down.

    Solid fuel heating is not a DIY job no matter what advice you get from these forums. You only have to read some of these posts with my background to see how ludicrous some of the advice is...but to the unsuspecting...how do you know what is right and wrong...Read the building regulations or speak to your local building inspector...or better still, get the flue manufacturers instructions for installation and follow them to the letter...then if things go wrong...they are answerable..not you.

    Have a good day...and stay safe

    David



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 eddie4


    hi David
    i tried ti pm you but doesnt seem to be working, can you advise if you run or know of a sove installing course available in the north, i have looked into HETAS in the uk but the north would be much handier

    Many Thanks
    Eddie


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 Omron1


    Hi All,
    New board member here
    In relation to down draught problems I have a bungalow in Wexford with 2 chimneys back to back and the flues are side by side. Bought the house about 3 years ago and never lit the front room fire. We had both chimneys swept after we moved in. When we light the backroom fire I have a serious problem with smoke coming out of the front room fireplace so bad that I ended up sealing the fireplace in the front room. I was convinced the smoke was being sucked down the chimney however I was advised by my father who knows everything that this was not possible.I rang a chimey specialist company to try and get someone to come out to inspect the flue however it was quite expensive to get a flue inspection and after a long conversation with him and reading a few posts I am now again convinced it is a down draught problem. Last night I sealed the top of the flue of the front room and lit the fire in the back room and no smoke came out.
    In terms of ventilation there are no vents in any of the walls in the house. House was built 1989 approx.
    House is surrounded by Lelandi Trees approximately same height as ridge line.
    Questions:
    Does my test last night prove that the problem is a downdraught problem if not what else can I do to prove the problem?
    Is there anything other than the H Cowl that will do the trick I have seen something called the Eurocowl which might look a little better?
    Will I need a an anti downdraught device on both pots if I want to use both chimneys?

    Sorry for the long post but I just want to get it sorted out soon.
    Thanks to anyone who has read to this far.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,045 ✭✭✭ttm


    Omron1 wrote: »
    Hi All,
    New board member here
    In relation to down draught problems I have a bungalow in Wexford with 2 chimneys back to back and the flues are side by side. Bought the house about 3 years ago and never lit the front room fire. We had both chimneys swept after we moved in. When we light the backroom fire I have a serious problem with smoke coming out of the front room fireplace so bad that I ended up sealing the fireplace in the front room. I was convinced the smoke was being sucked down the chimney however I was advised by my father who knows everything that this was not possible.I rang a chimey specialist company to try and get someone to come out to inspect the flue however it was quite expensive to get a flue inspection and after a long conversation with him and reading a few posts I am now again convinced it is a down draught problem. Last night I sealed the top of the flue of the front room and lit the fire in the back room and no smoke came out.
    In terms of ventilation there are no vents in any of the walls in the house. House was built 1989 approx.
    House is surrounded by Lelandi Trees approximately same height as ridge line.
    Questions:
    Does my test last night prove that the problem is a downdraught problem if not what else can I do to prove the problem?
    Is there anything other than the H Cowl that will do the trick I have seen something called the Eurocowl which might look a little better?
    Will I need a an anti downdraught device on both pots if I want to use both chimneys?

    Sorry for the long post but I just want to get it sorted out soon.
    Thanks to anyone who has read to this far.

    Is it possible to check if you've had a chimney fire that has burnt out the lining so one flue is connected to the other before they reach the outside world. Not seen that on newer houses but have on older ones.

    Thats just one possiblity there are many others as I''m sure you'll read.


  • Registered Users Posts: 189 ✭✭sooty_soupy


    Hi Omron, welcome to the forum. The condition you have is almost definitely siphonage. The condition arises where one flue chamber is cooler, therefore at an unequal pressure to that of the one being used. On calm days especially you will run into a problem where the colder flue can actually suck the smoke into the room, so your suspicions were almost correct. I would be hesitant to spend money on anti down draught cowls etc, as I don't believe this is actually the case. You have tried what I would have suggested in that if a plastic bag temporarily is used to block the offending flue and there was no problem, the simple cure is remove the bag and replace the LIVE chimney pot with a taller pot, which staggers the termination points, thus curing the problem and not affecting the performance of either.

    Hope this helps.

    best regards

    David


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 Omron1


    Hi ttm & sooty soupy,
    Thanks for the responses. ttm I don't see any evidence of a chimney fire and prior to us buying the house it was used mostly as a holiday home so the fires would not have been used much I would guess and we got both chimneys swept when we moved in. Is there anything other than getting a camera survey done that can confirm your suspicions.
    Sooty soupy since my last post I have been speaking to a neighbour up the road who had a similar problem with smoke coming down the chimney and he cut one of the flue pots down to the chimney cap and it solved the problem. I have checked and the chimney pots on the top of my chimney are both approximately 60cm from the chimney cap so if I cut one pot down by half would you think this should be a sufficient offset of the pots.

    Thanks again for your posts.


Advertisement