Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Most Overrated film?

1234568

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,589 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    Gangs of New York
    There Will Be Blood


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,563 ✭✭✭stateofflux


    Woden wrote: »
    Blade Runner. Watched it straight after reading the book. What a let down.

    probably because you watched it straight after reading the book....it is a very good film....i don't know if it was that overrated at the time....in fact it was a commercial and critical flop...only gaining acceptance through vhs based cult following...same as 'the thing'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭pipeliner


    all of the peter jackson movies. Well the lord of the rings ones and king kong. I admit i bought into the hype on release, but i watched king kong again and thought it was rubbish. I dont have a spare 400 hours so dont ask me to watch the Lotr trilogy again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,185 ✭✭✭asdasd


    Dark Knight
    DARK KNIGHT
    DARK KNIGHT

    Eventually the reaction against Dark Knight will be so severe that it will end up in the most underrated film threads.

    "Everybody said it was crap, but I think it is great"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    pipeliner wrote: »
    all of the peter jackson movies. Well the lord of the rings ones and king kong. I admit i bought into the hype on release, but i watched king kong again and thought it was rubbish. I dont have a spare 400 hours so dont ask me to watch the Lotr trilogy again.

    love all the movies above , think king kong 2005 is incredibly under rated


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,128 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    Pretty much any oscar film in memory for me

    No country for old men, slumdog etc.

    Also Anchorman, really didn't find it funny what so ever.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 9,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭ziedth


    I thought Slumdog was overrated too,

    Not that I thought it was a bad film by any means I just don't think it warrants the blinding success that it has had.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,185 ✭✭✭asdasd


    Also Anchorman

    Yes! Absolutely!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 441 ✭✭purple_hatstand


    Pretty much any oscar film in memory for me

    No country for old men, slumdog etc.

    Also Anchorman, really didn't find it funny what so ever.

    Lots of people seem to not like NCFOM which I can understand (I love it but I understand) but to use this to denounce "Pretty much any Oscar film in memory" is a bit much.

    I'm not a huge fan of the Academy but, in spite of themselves and just by the law of averages, they have to get it right sometimes.

    In my lifetime, Best Picture Oscars have been awarded to:

    'Midnight Cowboy'
    'The French Connection'
    'The Godfather'
    'The Sting'
    'The Godfather Part II'
    'One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest'
    'Annie Hall'
    'The Deer Hunter'
    'Ghandi'
    'Amadeus'
    'Rain Man'
    'The Silence Of The Lambs'
    'Unforgiven'
    'Schindler's List'
    'The English Patient'
    'American Beauty'
    'Gladiator'
    'Million Dollar Baby'


    .......amongst many others. If you don't like ANY of these films or ANY of the others nominated for or given the same award, I wonder, I wonder, I wonder etc.......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭Vamoose Killers


    Hmmm, the last three look a tad out of place there.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 441 ✭✭purple_hatstand


    Hmmm, the last three look a tad out of place there.


    I would argue that 'American Beauty' and 'Million Dollar Baby' have similar qualities in terms of characterisation, emotional depth, dramatic tension and narrative arc (as well as containing exceptional performances on both sides of the camera) to many of the other films on the list. 'Gladiator' I like for the sheer power of Crowe's performance and for Scott's direction.

    These are opinions, of course......but I believe the central point I was making is a valid one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭foxyboxer


    Read an interview with Matt Damon during the week where he suggested that the Academy Awards should be presented 10 years after the fact. i.e. that the Oscars this year would have been for the Movies released during 1998. This would certainly eliminate the aggressive lobbying which have made the Oscars in recent years unwatchable (i.e. A Beautiful Mind, Chicago, Titanic, Crash etc). Also with the benefit of hindsight, the films of that year can be appreciated in greater detail. Certainly, an interesting idea.

    Looking at the nominees at the time, I would say that Shakespeare in Love should not have won best picture, nor Gwyneth Paltrow for Best Actress or Roberto Benigni for Best Actor. The Truman Show would have definitely been a stronger contender with hindsight. Cate Blanchett would be Best Actress, Ian McKellan as Best Actor and Kathy Bates supporting actress.

    [edit] Best Motion Picture Of The Year
    Shakespeare in Love
    Elizabeth
    Life Is Beautiful
    Saving Private Ryan
    The Thin Red Line

    [edit] Achievement in Directing
    Steven Spielberg - Saving Private Ryan
    Roberto Benigni - Life Is Beautiful
    John Madden - Shakespeare in Love
    Terrence Malick - The Thin Red Line
    Peter Weir - The Truman Show

    [edit] Best Performance By An Actor In A Leading Role
    Roberto Benigni - Life Is Beautiful
    Tom Hanks - Saving Private Ryan
    Ian McKellen - Gods and Monsters
    Nick Nolte - Affliction
    Edward Norton - American History X

    [edit] Best Performance by An Actress In A Leading Role
    Gwyneth Paltrow - Shakespeare in Love
    Cate Blanchett - Elizabeth
    Fernanda Montenegro - Central Station
    Meryl Streep - One True Thing
    Emily Watson - Hilary and Jackie

    [edit] Best Performance By An Actor In A Supporting Role
    James Coburn - Affliction
    Robert Duvall - A Civil Action
    Ed Harris - The Truman Show
    Geoffrey Rush - Shakespeare in Love
    Billy Bob Thornton - A Simple Plan

    [edit] Best Performance By An Actress In A Supporting Role
    Judi Dench - Shakespeare in Love
    Kathy Bates - Primary Colors
    Brenda Blethyn - Little Voice
    Rachel Griffiths - Hilary and Jackie
    Lynn Redgrave - Gods and Monsters


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 9,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭ziedth


    foxyboxer wrote: »
    Read an interview with Matt Damon during the week where he suggested that the Academy Awards should be presented 10 years after the fact. i.e. that the Oscars this year would have been for the Movies released during 1998. This would certainly eliminate the aggressive lobbying which have made the Oscars in recent years unwatchable (i.e. A Beautiful Mind, Chicago, Titanic, Crash etc). Also with the benefit of hindsight, the films of that year can be appreciated in greater detail. Certainly, an interesting idea.

    Looking at the nominees at the time, I would say that Shakespeare in Love should not have won best picture, nor Gwyneth Paltrow for Best Actress or Roberto Benigni for Best Actor. The Truman Show would have definitely been a stronger contender with hindsight. Cate Blanchett would be Best Actress, Ian McKellan as Best Actor and Kathy Bates supporting actress.

    [edit] Best Motion Picture Of The Year
    Shakespeare in Love
    Elizabeth
    Life Is Beautiful
    Saving Private Ryan
    The Thin Red Line

    [edit] Achievement in Directing
    Steven Spielberg - Saving Private Ryan
    Roberto Benigni - Life Is Beautiful
    John Madden - Shakespeare in Love
    Terrence Malick - The Thin Red Line
    Peter Weir - The Truman Show

    [edit] Best Performance By An Actor In A Leading Role
    Roberto Benigni - Life Is Beautiful
    Tom Hanks - Saving Private Ryan
    Ian McKellen - Gods and Monsters
    Nick Nolte - Affliction
    Edward Norton - American History X

    [edit] Best Performance by An Actress In A Leading Role
    Gwyneth Paltrow - Shakespeare in Love
    Cate Blanchett - Elizabeth
    Fernanda Montenegro - Central Station
    Meryl Streep - One True Thing
    Emily Watson - Hilary and Jackie

    [edit] Best Performance By An Actor In A Supporting Role
    James Coburn - Affliction
    Robert Duvall - A Civil Action
    Ed Harris - The Truman Show
    Geoffrey Rush - Shakespeare in Love
    Billy Bob Thornton - A Simple Plan

    [edit] Best Performance By An Actress In A Supporting Role
    Judi Dench - Shakespeare in Love
    Kathy Bates - Primary Colors
    Brenda Blethyn - Little Voice
    Rachel Griffiths - Hilary and Jackie
    Lynn Redgrave - Gods and Monsters


    Top class Post there Budd,

    Shakespeare in love doing so well pretty much sums up the oscars for me,
    Vamoose Killers Hmmm, the last three look a tad out of place there.

    I disagree mate, Gladiator and MDB are two of my all time fav films. American Beauty I wasn't keen on aprt from Kevin Staceys preformance.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,657 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    pipeliner wrote: »
    all of the peter jackson movies.
    Bad Taste is a great little film. But yeah King Kong was pants especially if you have a moderate understanding of physics.


    Shawshank again, it's got a feel good ending but much of the rest has been done before.

    The Shinning


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,482 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I presume that by saying overrated you mean critically well received but you just don't rate it.

    The Royal Tenenbaums got a great reception from the critics but bored the pance off me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,816 ✭✭✭Acacia


    Juno, Kill Bill and Napoleon Dynamite.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭m83


    Acacia wrote: »
    Juno, Kill Bill and Napoleon Dynamite.

    Yes, Yes and more Yes!! Fine choices!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    The Firm.
    I know a film cannot live up to the book but that failed miserably. It wasted 2 hours of my life and I want them back :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭pipeliner


    Jumper: Total film gave it 5 stars.

    It may be a little cruel of me as i only caught the first 10 minutes, fell asleep and woke up for the last 10. So maybe the middle deserved 5 stars.

    Another honorable mention goes to Munich, it just moved sooo god damned slowly for me.

    Wall:E or whatever it's called. I think it just got praise because it's pixar.

    No country for Old men: It was great in parts, but it didn't know how to finish.

    All of George Clooney's movies


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 911 ✭✭✭994


    Schindler's List.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭godspal


    The Pianist:
    While technically being brilliant; the cinematography of the film was grey and dampened which really suited and eccentuated the tone of the film. Also some of the set pieces such as the old man being dropped from the second story window really create a sense of shock. However the script is atricious, when they are talking about the war at the beginning of the film I really just wanted punch them in the mouth, the dialogue seemed so forced and unnessacary.
    The next thing I really hated about this film was the character development. The film centres around a character who really does not show any likeable characteristics or any grounds for people feeling empathy for him (outside of him simply being a Jew.) The ending and him surviving feels somewhat empty in the hollow of post-war poland. Unenjoyable, not provoking... Just superficial.

    Saving Private Ryan:
    Typical Spielberg. Over-sentimental, over the top, more style then substance.

    Definitely not a bad, actually quiet a good film Fargo, but the amount of focus it gets compared to all the other Cohen Brother films (espically Millers Crossing and Raising Arizona) is not justified.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,657 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    godspal wrote:
    Definitely not a bad, actually quiet a good film Fargo, but the amount of focus it gets compared to all the other Cohen Brother films (espically Millers Crossing and Raising Arizona) is not justified.
    Fargo looses a million points because of the gimmick of pretending it's a true story.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    BrightEyes wrote: »
    The Firm.
    I know a film cannot live up to the book but that failed miserably. It wasted 2 hours of my life and I want them back :(

    +1

    the firm is awfully dull and the story is no better than in any tv movie , it also has the always awfull jean tripplehorn

    amasingly , it was among the top 5 grossing movies of 1993


  • Posts: 8,016 ✭✭✭ Boone Fast Troop


    godspal wrote: »
    Saving Private Ryan:
    Typical Spielberg. Over-sentimental, over the top, more style then substance.

    How dare you :mad: :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭m83


    The boondock saints. It makes me weep with anger yet so many people love it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28 Anton Chigurh


    Mulholland Drive - WTF is it about?

    Superman Returns - Pants.

    Casino Royale - Decent Bond Flick, but that's not saying much.

    1st post by the way!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    Mulholland Drive - WTF is it about?

    Superman Returns - Pants.

    Casino Royale - Decent Bond Flick, but that's not saying much.

    1st post by the way!!

    superman returns was horrendous alright


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,573 ✭✭✭Mal-Adjusted


    how about Watchmen, i was expecting a master-piece, instead i got a film that was, meh...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,160 ✭✭✭✭banshee_bones


    Am in agreement with the following as over rated
    Crash
    and
    Donnie Gordon Sticky Mandrill


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,219 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    "300"... Cliché and too predictable throughout.


Advertisement